There never was “news articles” on Gizmodo. It’s a blog. These are not journalists, they are bloggers.
There never was “news articles” on Gizmodo. It’s a blog. These are not journalists, they are bloggers.
What is ‘tie at tie at 8 pm’? Why don’t they use spellcheck and grammar check????
The grammatical errors, comma abuse, and questionable punctuation bother me. The rampant misspellings are absurd, and do not serve a site that at times desires to be Serious Journalism.
Someone needs to help them!
Blerg.
Oh I see so it’s “dumb, disingenuous questions” that I’m asking but not dumb, disingenuous that Deadspin calls out others for a system that they are fully supporting as well? How much of a difference is there between Deadspin and ESPN when they both give coverage to the NCAA, but the latter at least does investigative…
Why does Deadspin, which uses the tagline ‘Death to the NCAA’ still cover college sports and therefore remains a cog in the NCAA’s fucked-up business machine? It’s like employing Hamilton Nolan and then having one of your sites run a podcast with McDonald’s. It makes no sense.
The FBI can do more than one thing at once. This is the same dumbass reasoning as “WHY ARE PEOPLE WORRIED ABOUT TRUMP’S TWEETS, HE’S RUINING THE WORLD!!!”
Not monitoring potential school shooters frees up some time.
“I guess that was the short program,” Tessa said, watching the smoke rise from the end of her cigarette.
She is also now pregnant.
And she has to ride his face, multiple times a day.
I was laughing about this last night with my girlfriend. I think it was the girl before Goggia’s run he was talking about how mediocre she was skiing and how slow she was going, her tuck wasn’t good, then she hit the split timer and she had the fastest time of the day. He immediately switched to how fast she was going…
Come on, you’re better than this! My wife and I play in a bowling league together and we’re not fucking.
That was ba-yeah-yeah-yad.
I’m a bit embarassed for you that you think this is a major scoop
The embarrassing thing is your smugness and naivety of the fact that there is nothing wrong with what ESPN did. They weren’t covering up a groundbreaking story about how there’s poison in the chicken or that the menu items are falsely advertised with incorrect calories. The dude lost weight by dieting and probably…
Sportswriters don’t require ethics. You aren’t journalists.
When finally reached for comment, Wendy’s was notably frosty.
Am I supposed to be upset over this? It sounds to me like ESPN should have been smart enough not to trash one of their sponsors in a headline in the first place.