You're discussing if those who have been investigated for rape should be "celebrated in public for their football talents." That isn't about the rapist but about those who are awarding him and supporting his career.

I'd be interested if Jezebel, being so celebrity-obsessed, is as critical of actors and actresses who have worked with Roman Polanski post-rape charges. For the record, a rapist has been supported in public by Harrison Ford, Hugh Grant, Sigourney Weaver, Ben Kingsley, Johnny Depp, Adrien Brody, Ewan McGregor, Timothy…

And yet, most college football players don't get away with having a career. They are typically poor men of color who the university uses to gain some prestige and then they throw them out at the first opportunity. Let's not use broadstrokes about college football players like everything is some nerds vs. jocks movie.…

Some of us know black men who are automatically a suspect whatever they do. Can I bring that experience to this case and let that lens color (no pun intended) my opinion of what happened here?

You really don't see the numerous ways they tried to slim her?

Sorry, if you're going to play art critic, then you might want to be able to conjugate verbs at a 6th grade level.

He was the only redeeming part of that steaming pile of crap. The producers, the crew, the guests all acted like they were in some high school production. Sorry about your video games shows.

"Video games is becoming the biggest form of entertainment, and is finally being considered art which it is."

This is a Gawker family article. I wouldn't be so sure about their knowledge on anything.

I never understood why videos with awesome soundtracks and gameplay can't have awesome gameplay too.

If you're so shitfaced drunk that you can't sober up and then go home that night, then it's probably unethical to participate in a threesome with that person.

Threesomes aren't sleep-overs. That's a rule. Not only is that a recipe for an awkward morning, but ain't nobody got time to make all that breakfast.

We're surrounded by enough depressing shit in the real world, in our everyday lives and on the news.

Because Jezebel is like US Weekly with a thin neoliberal feminist veneer, so they can be like "But, Take Back the Night is not yours, JT" and then forgive him the next day because he and other celebrities keep the lights on at Jezebel HQ.

Why do people need "good" people in their shows? Real people are complex and morally ambiguous at best. The sort of aversion some people have to realistic portrayals of humans and their relationships with other people is something I don't get.

Do you really get glamour out of Mad Men? The show is pretty brutal and doesn't give anybody a pass on their bullshit. Do people need some morally unambiguous good guys and bad guys in their TV?

I mean, all shows can't be as enthralling as Scandal with the camera noises, bad acting, and soap opera-level writing and plot twists.

White people are quite familiar with being white, but they are still uncomfortable with talking about whiteness or white privilege. I think familiarity may make people even more uncomfortable with the criticisms than unfamiliarity.

I had a perfectly good conversation with another person. Again, nothing I said was untrue. And, again, I have no reason to believe that people aren't made incredibly uncomfortable by talking about class.

No, in that case, you are the joke.