shadibadoo
Shadibadoo
shadibadoo

But the guns were there to protect Norton and Stumbo from the notoriously violent Pokémon fans.

Just another example of the liberal media doing its best to strip Americans of their God-given Second Amendment rights in order to pave the way for a Clinton-run dictatorship.

Dude, you're totally gay.

Now playing

Actually what you expressed is the true feminism ideals, she does not talk about that or give good examples of what she wants.
Most of her videos are her looking at part of a game and saying a bunch of lies.

Nobody gives a shit in the real world.

This interview made me realize just how strange the whole gamergate fiasco must look to outsiders.

One of the worst things to come out of gamergate is that it gave her validity in the eyes of those that don't know better. Apart from the obviously vile attacks and threats, it's the single worst thing to come out of this whole debacle. Her arguments and conclusions are so flimsy that she could have been argued into

Bath Salts.

At least we'll all get the same ending.

this game is still alive? I remember walking into a public library and seeing 8 year old kids playing this game...

In regards to the title, I kinda want a survival game where you don't die, but your journeys wear your character down more and more until you're left with a crippled pile of flesh that can just gurgle and watch the sun set. Pls.

Basically, as far as I can tell, the complaints are threefold:

Why should he have to apologize for something he didn't do? He's trying to find some middle ground there, but he doesn't -have- to do that at all. I like Patricia's work, in general, but I think this article misses the mark. I'm a staunch feminist and I believe strongly in consent (to the point where I wouldn't even

Without picking sides, why should the onus be on Max to start a public discussion about consent and rape culture? He publicly addressed the situation and his accuser in a similar forum that was used to accuse him. He professed his innocence. I'm not a lawyer, but I think that it would be unwise for him to open the

While his response is odd... I find this post a bit more troubling. It seems like this post is saying "we're going with Temkin's version of events happened, but..."

This article is loaded with gold:

Only partway through, but I don't see how his initial post was bad? I mean, he says he didn't rape her, provides his side of the story, and that's that.

He's not trying to start a conversation about consent, he's trying to make a response to an accusation that he sexually assaulted someone.