The artist is kinda hot, then.

I vote that things didn't get hotter—you just got (t)here late. Thirty or so years ago I could find stories about double-penised lizard men having sex with witchy women (I really am not good on the details on that book), and stopped reading Piers Anthony quite abruptly because he was overly sexualising girls younger…

Man, this sounds like a cue for someone that thinks Harry Potter is depressingly second rate, and the books are a bland amalgam of more interesting work by more imaginative authors to speak up, and there could be that whole different people have different tastes thing.

You really can't tell them apart...seriously? I mean, if you took all the hair off, they'd honestly look the same to you?

"She even invents a love interest for Sirius: Roxanne Malfoy, older sister to Lucius. Apparently, she thought Sirius wasn't getting enough makeouts."

The members of the family don't matter but the cartoon does.

Left or right?

And in case you were gonna come back with some more opinions, check the industry press: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/live-feed/mtv-picking-teen-wolf-53682

It's not the *article* which makes it true, it's the SHOWRUNNERS and the legality of the PRODUCTION which make it true. Not me, not IO9, and you can't make it untrue. It's a done deal, all sewn up, happened before a frame of footage was shot. I'm not sure how that's even up for debate. This article is reporting, not…

It was in every Hunger Games article, it was in the O Deck, and it spurred a separate "Did Hunger Games rip off Battle Royale?" article...if you were interested at all in Hunger Games it would have taken some missing, plus skimming the front page while the article about it was there.

I'm making a case that they're based on the same concept. That was the job of the first sentence. The second sentence was to say that's the limit of it (they don't share plot similarities as well), but I think the first sentence is fairly clear.

People were really going calling themselves Gaters? Wacky.

The show's fun to watch—I've been through the first five seasons at least three times now. No, I have no near term plans to do it again, but if you don't like the show, I'd toss the question.

He's a teenaged kid named Scott who gets a lot better at sports when he turns into a werewolf, and with a friend named Stiles and a coach named Finstock. Nope, there aren't any shared plot beats, but they tip their hat to the same concept, and if they hadn't, people would be screaming bloody murder about them having…

I think they need a god that's small enough to fit in their own brain, not one that's infinite and inestimable and even ineffable. If you can't predict your deity down to the very last detail, how can you lord it over the non-believers and act as his/her avatar here on earth, smiting and shitting on people?

There are things you can insert that don't cause that—so the answer has to do with which qualities of this cause this response.

Yes, next time you're at my house, I'll make sure you don't forget.

And when they're not dead, Joss's kills hurt less. I'll say that much for him.

It's not like people know the meta behind any of the kills he makes, but he still gets the heartless murderer label slapped on him each time anyway.

Why would God ask them? They're burning in hell. He's surely not the sort of guy that goes by and rattles the cages of the losers is he?