What are you talking about? I haven't had this much easy fun since Denton opened the floodgates. Now I get what he was trying to accomplish...crafty motherfucker. Very crafty!

I'm afraid that if God hasn't told you the speed of light is known. And God hasn't told you how far away anything is. Sheeit, until we're further updated, it's turtles all the way down.

I know, I shouldn't have labelled the OP religious—that was way out of line, and I promise I'll watch my behaviour and try not to do that in the future. I can see where God might have to make an extra effort to still love me after I tossed this guy onto his side. I'm so glad he stopped holding grudges.

If you're going to play, play. Don't just sit in the bleachers and throw popcorn.

You're adorable.

But they all just showed up all at once! It's like shooting fish in a barrel. I'm only human, and the targets are so big...

I was wondering what the third group could be (once you eliminate science and faith), and I've worked it out—tinhats, right? I need to ask about the moon landing, and the grassy knoll while I have your guys excited attention.

It would be really sad for someone to throw aside science and not have faith to keep them warm in the dark. I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy.

Point me to a scientist that put an exact age on a galaxy, and I'll point you to a charlatan having problems being peer reviewed.

How's that working out for them?

Did science steal your lunch money when you were a kid? If a scientist needs to set foot somewhere to prove its age (as opposed to observing it from over here and applying perfectly consistent scientific principles), I'm assuming you've been to heaven, right? How do you know about God, and precisely what he did?

That makes no sense in context. I have even less of an idea what he meant now.

I don't know what you mean by tweet definition, so your question looks to me like: "why do purple have to name things?"

The only thing the monolith of feminism is intending to create is better situations for women. Some feminists feel that equality is achieved by pulling people down to their level, but absolute not all—not all feminists, not all schools of feminists. I posit not even the majority, because you are ignoring the quiet…

"Strength implies that there is a something or someone of weaker ability"

I think that some feminists have been aggressive (and some are nutcases), but it's hardly representative. Statistically, it would be like characterising anti-racists as all being members of the Black Panthers.

But how does that serve the organisation and the consciences of the people in it?

So this is what wanting to unheart someone so you can heart them all over again feels like...

You're seriously asking why Comic Con shouldn't be hostile towards...Jews? You figure it's okay for the organisation to take an official "call them kikes if you wanna" stance, because they'd don't have to be nice?

It's "just human right" in the same way campaigning for any equality of civil rights is—anti-racism, anti-homophobia, anti-ablism.