OK I ORIGINALLY HAD HER PETTING MEREDITH AS WELL but then I realized that Taylor had three hands in that imaginary situation and the box-wine was more important to me
OK I ORIGINALLY HAD HER PETTING MEREDITH AS WELL but then I realized that Taylor had three hands in that imaginary situation and the box-wine was more important to me
You've forgotten to add Taylor Swift's cat Meredith to your beautiful imagery! MEREDITH WILL NOT BE IGNORED.
FREE SPEECH! FREEZE PEACH!!!
So...those little nine and eleven year old kids that self-identified as bronies? Including the one that hanged himself?
I'm sorry if my implications were too subtle for you, but I'll spell it out: I despise racism, misogyny, abuse, all of that. I loathe anything that attacks and victimizes children. Actually...no, no, I made that pretty clear when I said feminist, anti-rape...you should have picked up on that. I have no idea how you…
Sham? Wow!
YOU SHOULD CARE THE MOST ABOUT WHAT I THINK YOU SHOULD CARE THE MOST ABOUT AND YOU SHOULD MAKE NO ROOM FOR FRIVOLITY BECAUSE OUTRAGE!
Yeah! And why haven't you posted on the ebola crisis in Africa?! Or all that, like plastic shit floating around somewhere in the Pacific?
I really wish Cyrus would keep her frickin' tongue in her mouth.
Ah... You too know the legend of Rosie Dublin.
bored enough to come comment, it seems
My kids would get a pet unicorn if I could find one!!!!
I'm fairly certain that's Rosie Dublin you're replying to, if you remember her. It's pointless, she's a rabid stan. She starts hurling the C word after three comments, on average.
Petty, says you with half a dozen screen names so you you cab rant about Jennifer Aniston. Jolie very much cares about courting the press. She's as inauthentic as the rest of the them.
I feel like maybe you need to pick better things to hate than some loving family's wedding.
to be clear: my complaints are about the original stonewall article. Not this blog post.
Dear Kat. If you are going to read historical things from back in the Old Days, you are going to have to harden up, dearie.
It really doesn't read that way, considering the lack of context clues that one has to look for when sarcasm is presented in unadorned text. The body of the article's just reporting his claim and providing reasons why it may actually be true. It's only the comments that are providing reasons why it's probably not what…
"Which is weird because they're all celebrities and have nothing to do with your life"
Rosiedublin?