But when you consider the over 1 million people serving in the military, their job is statistically safer than lumberjack or corrects officer. You do use lumber, don’t you?

I know where you are going with this. We live in a country where we combine a military element to EVERYTHING we do as a nation. From baseball games to celebrating the birth of Jesus. Obviously, if this guy was a heart surgeon or physicist, it would be less clickable.

Thank you for being one of the few readers to actually understand the problem at hand and suggest a solution. So many people just do not get what this shift really means and call for more “BOOTSTRAPS”.

Your whole post was kinda “no shit Sherlock” without addressing my point.

Yes. Rather than addressing my points you are making your own argument on my behalf then attacking it. I pointed out each one and explained why it is a straw man.

As that happens, people will bleed away into new areas.

May you and all your redneck friends buy a house somewhere else. Seriously. Please.

Nuhuhh! You lost!

Nice troll. Unfortunately you wasted your one post on a strawman.

and how many of these 65 people have gone up to this guy neighborly like and asked him if he could perhaps move it somewhere else or store it on the side of the house? I feel like the answer is near zero. It sounds like these people went the ‘media and legal’ route before being neighbors

And what happens when people are obsolete? This is what I am talking about. Soon there will be no job to retrain for. Historical precedence doesn’t account for this situation.

Wow. Completely missing the point and responding with your own agenda. OK, I will go through this.

You didn’t answer the question: How many didn’t sign?

See that this will eventually replace all taxi, Uber, and Lyft drivers and looking at how technology is impacting other service areas, I think the fact there will be a segment of our society that will be permanently unemployed. Soon, the jobs one can retrain for will also be done by machine. There will be nowhere else…

In any subdivision, 65 is a pretty significant number. Try and get 65 of your neighbors to even answer the door. At 65, it is no longer anecdotal or a personal opinion.

No. The offense is person B decreasing the pleasure person A gets from his house without compensation.

We need to air on the side of liberty and property rights.

Not by my logic. By the fact 65 of his neighbors agree the trailer is an eyesore.

Anecdotal doesn’t mean what you think it does.

Read my post. I didn’t say anyone passed. I said if 65 of neighbors agree it is an eyesore, then it probably is.