Sorry, did I miss the headline saying "Kawhi Leonard posterizes Chris Anderson!!!" Otherwise, what is the point of this inane post?

Jezebel posters (I can't bring myself to call them writers) are good only at trying to denigrate the work of talented writers who put work into their journalism, not actually producing journalism of their own. Sad.

No such thing as umpire interference in that circumstance. Could not be called.

In fact, the goal was not "Thanks to First Important Use of Goal-Line Technology." It was thanks to a correct call by the linesman. All the technology did was confirm what a human had already properly ruled on.

Mila Kunis (who once again proves she can't act...) was making a small, funny point. Leave it to Jezebel to turn it into an overblown, humorless, 1,500-word pile of crap.

I find his podcast unlistenable, except when he has really compelling guests.

If by definitive you mean longest, then yes!

Fault? What's he supposed to do, move six feet back from the plate?

They highlight all the interesting/unusual events in a game. If they didn't show it you'd accuse them of covering it up and only showing the positive stuff.

Oh, and by the way: You're kind of an arrogant dick, aren't you?

I've been a soccer referee for 10 years. I know the game.

This has always bugged me about soccer/football. It wasn't a foul worthy of a penalty kick, but he did grab him. However, the referee's only choices are to either call the foul and thus award what will most likely be a goal, or call nothing. How about something in between, like playing a man down for a period of time,…

Or Dwyane Wade. Or Lebron. Or Manu Ginobli. Or...

How about Deadspin have actual umpires or referees on retainer, and they could check things out before posting yet another uninformed post concerning rules, officiating, etc.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. You NEVER have to throw to second, on or off the rubber, in any level of baseball. Ask any umpire.

The pitcher had the ball the whole time. I don't think you understand that he simply faked the throw to second while holding the ball. Absolutely legal (though totally bush league in my old-school opinion).

You're just making shit up. You NEVER have to throw to second. NEVER.

That's a pretty broad statement; a lot of environmentalists disagree with you.

Agreed it's awkward and ugly, but I don't see where it's grammatically incorrect.

I don't see how you can call that a run-saving play. No way would Kendrick have tried to score if Cespedes hadn't fumbled the ball in the first place.