Nah, probably not. This season he is playing slightly worse (a WS/48 of .181) than Duncan’s rookie year (.191) and significantly worse than Duncan’s second (.213). KAT’s offense is more advanced than Duncan’s, but Duncan’s D was historically great immediately in the league.

I don’t care abot you.

🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

Yes, yes, scream louder and still no one hears. Impotence is not solved through elections, dearie.

Hows about instead you smash your face in frustration with a brick if proven wrong?

What will you do when proven wrong? Will you even acknowledge it?

Snookums, sorry no one thinks enough of you to try and convince you to not absolutely fucking suck. Sorry that you didn’t magically make everyone like you by being true to your garbage self.

So your vote decision followed the logic of a bitter teenager? Why would you admit that? Don’t you have the tiniest bit pf self-respect, you fucking dingus?

You have no real evidence for that beyond your desperation for the free market to prove your inane ideology right. It is a pathetic argument. You qre pathetic for offering it.

No one has it worse than you. You should self-immolate to bring attention to your cause.

Kidd was an inch taller and his best rebounding season (8.0 RB/36 in 2006/07) was 2.5 rebounds less than Westbrook this year and 0.2 RB less than Westbrook last year. Still fantastic on the boards though.

He is 6'3", though he is definitely dominating total rebounds for players under 6'3" (197, with Avery Bradley at 134) and RB% (16.3% to Bradley’s 11.8%). He also has the highest RB/36 min (10.5) of any player 6'3" with more than 100 minutes played since the early sixties, since Horace Walker grabbed 12.6 boards per 36…

Oh, obviously you need people to make fun of you or else you’d have no personality at all. You have decided at some point to validate every bully you have ever had by trying desperately to be their shadow. And the saddest part is you will never, ever deal with your problems.

I am just sad that your inferiority complex (nice 500 word essay about how you aren’t defensive, sad-sack) defines you. You can be better than you are.

You know, you don’t have to be so formal and actually write “hipsters”. You can just put “people that make me feel understandably insecure.”

So, you feel comfortable about judging people on whether they like things in the “right” way?

I think it is hilarious that you are mewling about my assumptions when you are whining about how you can’t understand a group of people who exist only in your wee lil noggin.

The anthem of the inane.

My assumption was more generous than the reality: you’ve decided to define your personality in opposition by people more interesting than you.

Something greater than the difference between you and a particularly idiotic and deeply resentful tree stump?