How would you get it from one end of the court to the other?
SeanMarks
seanmarks
That's all I remember. Accidentally recorded over everything else.
Or it was recorded onto a VHS tape that had previously had television on it. This is how things worked in the VHS days.
The only mention of ted talks in the article is that Brett Brown likes them. Of all the things to put in your headline, it seems like a super weird choice to try to shoehorn in one that's about someone else.
Oh, really? My bad. I hadn't really read up on what this weekend's proposals entailed, so just went with what the piece said (ie "Instead of a huge jump in 2016, the TV deal money would be phased in more gradually, starting this summer and continuing for a couple of years past 2016.").
In these negotiations they don't have close to that amount of leverage. There's a downside of smoothing to the owners - it means they'd start paying higher salaries next year, despite not getting the increased revenue until the following year. I think they'd give up on smoothing pretty easy. Really it's the players…
"Practically every every rule regarding the value of contracts—rookie maximums, veteran maximums, the mid-level exception, the bi-annual exception—flows from the total salary cap. For instance, the max contract that can be given to players in the league for fewer than seven years is 25% of the salary cap."
I love the guy who yells 'why not us?' at about the 1:25 mark. I don't follow football, but I'm pretty sure they're the reigning champs. Jesus, what an asshole.
@SnottieDrippen is a pretty good twitterer (?), though. Smart/funny guy. Def a reason he's a basketball twitter regular. Def def better than 'some chump'. And even more so after "I'm at my mum's house, lol" which is super awesome.
Looks to me like Brewer gathers with his right foot on the floor, then steps left, right, left. What am I missing?
I haven't done fantasy sports in a long time, but something I would look into would be whether there's a relationship between the errors and ownership rates. That is, is there was some sort of nefarious projection tweaking going on the most logical thing would be that they're over-projecting guys that people mostly…
55 hours of special features is pretty amazing considering that's about how much actual Breaking Bad there is.
55 hours of special features is pretty amazing considering that's about how much actual Breaking Bad there is.
I feel very weird about asking this question, or just discussing it in general, but I guess the best way is to just do it. Are we sure that's butt action?
Definitely some small sample size theatre, here. By my quick calculation, just under a third of the Mavs differential vs bad teams comes from the one freak blowout over the Sixers. Ditto New Orleans and their blowout over the TWolves. Not that they shouldn't be credited for those margins, just that it'll even out over…
Yeah, definitely freak accidents. A bit of a selection bias, too - I don't think we would've heard about this case if not for it being so close after PH.
There are wickets at both ends. The batsman stands in front of one set and is, in a sense, defending them. The bowler bowls from beside (and just in front of) the other set. One umpire stands behind the wickets at the bowler's end, facing down the pitch towards the batsman, and it sounds like it was him that got hit.
I mean, for the most part they do - cricketers get hit in the head regularly and you rarely even see so much as a concussion. Not sure if perfection is a realistic expectation.
Seriously. I still think about / don't understand the head lump Michael Papps got from Brett Lee in an ODI about a decade ago. Pretty gross.
I would love to hear the (at least) 6 players you put above McDaniels. I get MCW, who has played all of 4 games, and then I guess people might argue Wroten if they're just looking at the box score and nothing else. Who else is there?