seanleo1
SeanLEO
seanleo1

Obviously it’s because the rider is doing something that is unexpected to the majority of highway users while passing. I only said “presumptively” rather than making it strict liability because if it can be proved a car driver (say) changing lanes was being grossly negligent or intentionally trying to hit the rider,

Assuming it shouldn’t be automatically illegal (and after 10 years driving in CA I am used to motorcycles lane splitting and in fact move over in the lane so they can get by - even if I’d never do it myself unless traffic were stopped), isn’t the easiest fix to limit the maximum speed delta to 10MPH and make any

Uh-oh. I think my toilet paper is Confederate.

“All of this in the absence of traffic, of course. “

Can't be Florida, he's wearing a helmet.

Meh.

There are too many assumptions that this guy makes about how many people are actually reasonable.

We have a section of interstate highway I drive on every day on my way home. The road is elevated 30-40 feet above ground at one point, banked the wrong way, water pools in the lanes and doesn't properly drain,