OR they, being on the inside, see something in Graham's performance that leads them to think they're selling high.

Jon Jones is the guy who, in an interview once, said he would absolutely turn someone in for smoking weed (because it's wrong).

I hate everything you choose to be.

Erm, not quite. News outlets can pretend they don't exist, but they're not doing it for attention as much as you'd like to believe. There's some of that, probably, but you're forgetting why tech people do tech things. They want to see what they can make happen, regardless of exposure.

"Why not?'' Leaf said with a big smile and a big wink. "Everything else has gone as planned.''

You set it to post at 4:20, so neither.

Well you can also go fuck yourself. I don't now how you get "thinly-veiled threat" from that comment, but it sounds like you're really militant about your tourism.

Well, then the headline is plain wrong then, but "Insane Rampage followed by Ill-Advised Masturbatory Happening" isn't as grabby.

Honestly, that looks like a lot of fun, and it probably keeps them from throwing Molotovs at each other at other times.

Are we still pretending Qatar is going to host the World Cup?

You made your point, I just don't think anyone thinks it's correct. You attempted to stratify bad things based on your own opinions, and people have different opinions. Both your example, and this example, are bad things, but nobody else feels they're in a position to call one less-bad than the other.

Online ordering, re-order button. Nuff said.

How did that kid go down so hard so easily? Is that Officer Hancock?

I chose not to agree with you on purpose because hyperbole just makes things worse. You can all them psychopathic assholes as much as you'd like but the issue isn't that these people are mentally deranged. Framing them as such makes this problem a whole lot harder to solve because as we've seen, they can dig in all…

We could, but there are lots of people we could call Psychopathic Assholes in this world that aren't ISIS/ISIL/IS so it's probably not a constructive term, and certainly confusing if we're just talking about ISIS.

That's not really a "take" as much as it's a "fact" and the subjugation (through the auspices of religion) of the average person in that part of the world has been taking place for hundreds of years. The clerics and religious scholars were doing it before western powers arrived, and after the colonization of the area…

Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. They were using it before they became ISIS or IS. Not really new in any way.

What's your definition of impaired then, and how could you tell? If the people closest to a person can't tell anything is different, how can you possibly define impaired then?

I'm tiring? I've written one reply...

Oh shit, people are human? It's possible to be conflicted over a bad situation involving someone who you think is generally a good person but did something terrible?