Well technically, some crimes you serve the sentence concurrently and some are consecutive. It depends on the crime and the sentencing.

And the winner of the Darwin Award iiiiiiiisssss.....

new hashtag #apparentlyallmen

I was just thinking the same thing! Jezzie commenters are all about jumping on someone’s ass for not taking a stand, but when Drake literally takes a stand against violence against a girl, crickets.

Have you ever read perfume descriptors before? They’re always verbose and flowery

So if true, two men got drunk and went back to fool around. One blacks out and the other doesn’t realize it. Dude comes to, tells other dude to stop and he doesn’t want to do anything, and dude stops.

I had no idea! Thank you for enlightening me.

I think he’s also doing it to show that Puerto Rico can and will bounce back.

I’ve never been a Broadway nerd or anything, but I LOVE HAMILTON. I wasn’t able to see the show either, butlemme tell you, listening to the cast recording is great on its own. I promise.

If I was a flight attendant, I would keep a supply of blow darts full of sleepy juice in my pocket. BABY GO SLEEP

Well they may have. Just because it doesn’t fall under the definition of pyramid scheme doesn’t mean they didn’t break some other law.

A pyramid scheme is defined by investment and recruitment without an actual product. As far as I know, LLR consultants aren’t supposed to bring in more consultants, and there is an actual product that gets sold.

Well technically, it’s not a pyramid scheme because the “consultants” aren’t encouraged to recruit more consultants.

The most unbelievable part of this story is that Rand Paul mows his own lawn. #notbuyingit

An observation, the premise of which is “if the victim had done x, y would not have happened.” Pretty textbook victim blaming.

Way to victim blame dude.

Dude drop the snark and stop arguing for the sake of it. I’ve been a paralegal for more than a decade.

So back to my original point, he doesn’t need a “legal reason.” He needs a court case, which he currently has. There are only a handful of reasons a place can refuse to comply with a subpoena, and they don’t come up often. The records of UCB would be relevant to his case because, if he was a “serial rapist” and people…

Yes, sometimes a subpoena can be challenged, but it’s usually by the person the records have been subpoenaed from (in this case UCB.) The defendant here has no reason really to challenge it; the requesting party is the one who has to pay the copying fees and such.

Just because that’s what the initial ask is doesn’t mean that’s what the actual award, if plaintiff wins, would be. If it goes to trial, it would be on the jury to decide the award. If it settles out of court, it’s between the two parties to negotiate an amount.