scullymf
Zoe is a Thug
scullymf

Every one of these douches has a fucking grifter go fun dm e charity account too. It fucking kills me. Stones worth $20mil and rubes are giving him money out of their weekly paychecks. Fucking asshats.

And, quite frankly, one for good measure:  fuck off!

That was one of probably 40+ affirmative defenses included in the Answer. Along with consent, latches, statute of limitations, third party liability etc etc etc. It's boilerplate used in every single case to cover all bases. It does not mean the city is accusing plaintiff of causing the incident under the facts as

This “blame” is a stock standard affirmative defense. It’s automsticaly included in any responsive pleading where it’s remotely possible because if not raised it’s waived.  It would be malpractice not to include it.  It doesn’t mean it’s an actual argument that’s being raised.  

Oh, I am not giving him a pass on everything, I just respect what he did back then.

I’m pretty sure some of that ill-gotten $ was spent on a sidepiece (or pieces, given how ambitious this POS is), so maybe that’s part of why they came to court separately or certainly why he’s completely throwing her under the bus, while wrapping himself up in the American flag (“while I was serving the country, my

I grew up in that white/blonde/blue eyed suburban America—and then I got the fuck out because it was boring as shit. 

Burn in hell Trump! You are a fucking complete piece of shit, you lied/cheated/scammed your entire way through life, and fell upwards through the ranks of society through your inheritance and sleaziness. You don’t deserve to hold the title of POTUS, you don’t deserve any love, and all you deserve is a slow and painful

Verizon also stated that the matter had “nothing to do with net neutrality or the current proceeding in court.”

“A red wave” sounds like some sort of dorm-wide period syncing. Mike Pence’s face would melt off like the guy in Raiders of the Lost Ark. 

He’s still up for trial later on on a ton of other charges even apart from likely retrial on these ones.

I DGAF what she runs for. I’ll wish her good luck and be done with it.

Can we just have an investigation already?

I watched a couple of episodes, and they were pretty good for the most part. But the “commercials” were fucking unfunny train wrecks. It’s Alexa, but it demands meat!

I actually saw an interesting interview with a long-time Federal prosecutor who said that the “reasonable doubt” question gets asked ALL THE TIME.

He’s facing 18 counts. I suspect there will be a mixed bag: guilty on several counts, not guilty on a couple, and one or two where they can’t come to a decision.

A hung jury on all counts is doubtful, because there is just so much of a paper trail in this case. He might get off on some things, but I suspect he’ll get at least 20 years. That’s a lot for a man his age.

And people are doing the latter because solid proof was claimed but not provided to anyone (authorities, experts, or otherwise).

Why is it that some women are believed right off the bat without any burden of proof (the Chris Hardwick story comes to mind) and others need to prove themselves (in this instance)?

Mohanan told Minnesota Public Radio that she would not release the alleged tape because, “It sets the expectation for survivors of all kinds of forms of abuse, whether it be abuse toward women, abuse from police officers, abuse from other people in power, to have to be the ones, like I’m doing right now, to show and