I agree completely Marc Webb's interpretation can barely be called spider-man. There is soooo much wrong with the characters and simply with the writing and film making. Also I'm gonna go out on a limb and say Spider-Man 3 is a misunderstood movie.
Nice comment, immature troll.
That picture reminds me of only one thing. Call of Duty 4. That mission on hardest difficulty. The horror...the horror...
Yes to this. I hated this level. I REFUSED to pull the trigger for as long as possible.
Nah dude. I loved them. Let the haters hate.
Lots of good ones here. I like this:
It appears to me that they are attempting to portray proposed theoretical warp technology. I believe the large reflective black sphere they "fly into" and they warp away is an Alcubierre Drive.
Such a strong character. Up'ed even more when Ulic Qel-Droma hits the scene.
BOOM!
There's no supposition involved you've admitted yourself and you telegraph your presuppositions like Tony Romo. But I see that you really don't read historians but pseudo-text critics. So if you have the gumption to learn from the scholars of text critics try these: FF Bruce, NT Wright, Jeff Kloha, Jim Voelz, Michael…
Pagels and Marvin are clear examples of Higher Critics. Nothing new there. But I will do that which you might seem to fear and expose myself to a different perspective. But the fact that you would instantly discount the methodology and scholastic clout of noted historians because of a professed faith is tell tale…
Really? Who would you suggest these "top academics"'might be? Certainly not the highest respected church historians who thoroughly understand the method of history but also the tenets if theology? No perhaps those of the class who have an agenda to bear that speaks to your worldview? But of course not being open to…
I agree. Zack Snyder loves these muted, dark, moody palettes. Its one of his ways of injecting melodrama and ennui into the essence of his films. But I'd expect WB enjoys the lack of flair to the costuming to distance themselves from Marvels for bright vision. A matter of taste and preference I suppose.
You're making the exact revisionist history claim of which you accuse. And well renowned historians would challenge your presuppositions. I suggest you read them considering I have done so. Perhaps Mark Noll or Lewis Spitz.
*Sigh* I really love io9. But here we go the bash Christianity and weak attempts to legitimize fringe beliefs as revisionist history will light the boards a flame. I'm sorry but Gnosticism was never a Christian belief system it grew out of eastern religio-philosophical traditions and attempted to coopt Christian…
Gah thank you. I thought the turning of the head was a big deal in The Dark Knight.
Such instances are examples of Batman becoming pure wishfulfillment for both reader and writer. All rules of said universe are thrown out for pandering sake. Just because it's Batman.
The ending of Mass Effect 3 was widely panned for not delivering what players wanted. I on the other hand loved it. It was a a positively moving conclusion to the narrative arc that I had played.