Its line reminds me a lot of the new Mustang. Unfortunately (for BMW), I cannot think of a single reason to get this over the Mustang.

Because there needs to be an affordable private jet for all the normal people . . . . you know, the ones who have $5 million to blow on a plane they then need to hire a pilot to fly, a hanger to store, and a mechanic to service, but who just can’t afford a real private jet.

Dear lord this debate about “shooting brake” vs. “wagon” is getting tiresome. The only meaningless debate that I can think of that bothers me more is whether the word “err” needs be pronounced “urr” instead of “air” — perhaps so, but who wants to be right and then have to explain themselves every damn time they use…

I got a fever, and the only perscription, is more cowbell d-pillar chrome!

Agreed. That one part also reminds me of a Cadillac, which just seems incongruous with the swoopiness of the rest of the Tesla design language.

I did, but there also seemed to be fake red paint around them, so I figured that those were just for show. Hopefully so.

Interesting. I mean, they basically turned an X5 into a seriously broken Wrangler. But it looks cool in a Mad Max sort of way.

Count me suitably impressed.

Very good!

Not A Day Goes By Without Me Wanting The Alpine A110 to just ditch those round internal headlights already so it would be perfect (other than lacking a manual option).

I don’t need to know where I’m goin’; just need to know where I been!

Your friend sounds pretty awesome.

RIP, my friend. You came into this world as a mere Mustang, and went out like a glorious Prancing Stallion.

Thanks for the link. I had looked for it, but originally found a different document on the NTSB’s site that was more of a summary (like what is reported above), so left me with more questions. I looks like the computer saw it first as an unknown object, then a car, and finally as a pedestrian, and thus was having…

When I first glanced this, it reminded me a bit of the MR2.

This would certainly make it easier to get your track wheels to the track.

Was there any indication in the report as to why it failed to recognize the pedestrian as something to avoid? It’s odd that it saw an object of any kind in the road (of any kind) six seconds before, and yet did not feel it needed to try to avoid it. It’d be more understandable if it was malfunctioning and simply…

Wow! It really did! I never saw that before. It’s uncanny.

This is also a very good observation.

Wow. Mind blown. You see things very clearly.