I can do you one better: Years ago when I purchased a Twin Peaks box set, I didn't realize it didn't have the fucking pilot!

Does Fishing With John count as a Criterion television release? Or Carlos?

I can't wait to see what danger he finds himself in and then out of without being aware of his surroundings! Oh, Mr. Magoo, you are too much!

I love you, Quentin, but your opinions about things are usually bafflingly wrong.

Castlevania olives?

I thought the same thing when I re-watched it recently! She never got to do a whole lot on the show, being wrapped in plastic or as "Maddy", so when she acts the fuck out of Fire Walk With Me, it's something to see. She puts in an amazing performance. Her performance, alone, is worth seeing the movie. It happens…

For me, when I was done drinking and wanted to plug my gut and pass the fuck out, I hit up Del Taco. Specifically for their disgusting/delicious chili cheese fries.

Twin Peaks is one of those things I adore on a personal level, but the moment anyone says they don't like it, I just go, "Yeah, I get that."

Right? I'd buy this if I didn't own the Blu-ray boxset, I guess. Like, I assume this is for people who already own the series on DVD, but don't want to double-dip in order to watch "The Missing Pieces."

The remake of NotLD is fun in its own way… I enjoy it, but it doesn't have the (ugh) bite of the original, or the nastiness or the edge. The original is a fucking gut-punch. The remake is a movie to enjoy on some lazy Sunday afternoon on TV.

I remember when I saw Shaun of the Dead, I saw it with two guys I had nothing in common with, other than we had been in the same class together and had just graduated high school. We saw it together on a whim, high as fuck, and all three of us enjoyed it immensely.

He's one of those directors whose films I like, I love. But when he makes a film I don't like, I fucking hate it with a fiery passion. I'm pretty sure that, as a person, he's fucking garbage… but he's made some genuine shit that I love.

"I'm just giving you what you wanted!"

You know what? I'd be fine pretending to direct a movie while Spielberg really does it.

That's a typo.

I went a big, fat rubbery one for that guy when I saw some boring-ass movie about the apocalypse that just HAD TO HAVE real horses getting killed on camera.

It's like… look, if you want to make a disgusting horror movie, just fucking make one! You don't have to defend it as something else! If you want to make an exploitation movie, make a goddamned exploitation movie! There's no need to say, "Well, when this one fucked-up thing happens, it's deeper than…"

I've heard mixed things. I heard that due to DGA rules, Spielberg wasn't allowed to make both E.T. and Poltergeist (which take place in the same neighborhood, apparently—one being the light story, one being the dark story), so he had Tobe Hooper be the name attached to it.

Oh, god, how I love that excuse for fucked-up horror movies. Especially with something like "A Serbian Film."

For DDGA