That’s a lot of money, but the average selling price just passed $46K:

So if David T. can buy each car for $350, he will get enough $ to buy another car... perpetual motion does exist!

This. Cold starts on old cars are a bear.

Thank you.

Looks good, but how is this an SUV?

What about outward visibility? Have we reached peak Camaro yet?

Is that the Rover V8? Which is actually a Buick V8...

1932 Ford V8:

This. And while the Prius should be lauded for its efficiency, the EPA ratings on its trucks and SUVs are abysmal. Anyone for a green Toyota Tundra?

Here’s part of the problem:

Sell it as a side-by-side:

Nearly every article on the Tesla workers in “Berlin” conflates workers councils and unions.

It was interesting to see both Ford (with the new Escape) and Jeep (with the new Wagoneer and Grand Cherokee) talk about bigger windows, lower beltline, and better overall outward visibility. Someone is listening.

You’re exactly right. Perhaps to no surprise, the electric transit bus demos have already reached the same conclusion with winter heating: heat the stuff that passengers touch (seats, floor, handles, etc.) and heat some of the air, instead of heating just the air. That saves a lot of energy. 

And kept a high belt line to mirror the experience of riding in a 1970s LTD.

How do we thin pillars, lower the cowl, and enlarge the windows? In other words, how do we bring back excellent outward visibility? I would pay money for that.

Hat tip for the win. My brother and sister have owned six Subarus between the two of them... and 11 head gaskets.

The stylists were four committees who hated each other.

Perhaps. Until they take a long road trip somewhere with sparse or poorly-functioning fast charging.

Yeah. So much this. Lower the beltlines. Thin the pillars. Block off the rear and throw away the “sportback” styling.