scotz
Dream Theater of the Absurd
scotz

Your 1994 Toyota Pickup was likely a T100,

Yup.  A lot of things that are rare now were merely unpopular back then.

I will on rare occasion put ketchup on scrambled eggs, but I prefer hot sauce - usually Tapatio. Gotta have some ketchup on my fried taters, though.

Unlike some of the vehicles posted here, a pile of steaming cow shit can be useful.

I thought the CBR250 was a thumper...

Gotta crash ‘em all!

I recall reading that Honda also developed a 1.5L V12 for Formula One in the mid-60's that could rev to 14K - back when most other F1 engines didn’t even crack ten grand.

You misspelled Audi.

One reason these little four-pot engines can rev so high is because their reciprocating parts are really small. Keep in mind that a single cylinder on an F1 engine (max 3.5L displacement, max of 12 cylinders) of this era is larger than all four cylinders on this bike.

These are vehicles that died, died....

Granted, I’ve never rented one to travel any great distance, but the couple times I’ve rented from U-Haul I haven’t had any problems.

How come other people’s stuff is shit, but your shit is stuff?

The lead pic looks a lot like hushpuppies.  But these sound tasty too.

I agree with you that the Ridgeline is a good choice for people who want to be seen in a “truck”.  But I consider it basically a modern equivalent of an El Camino or Ranchero.

For a pickup truck, this ain’t bad.

I’m An Auto Blogger And Embarrassed To Pull Up To Press Events In My Rusted-Out Shitpile! What Car Should I Buy?

Actually more like 33% less - one gallon will take the Hybrid 24 miles, while the same distance requires 1.5 gallons with the V8.  Still a substantial improvement.

This reminds me of those dickheads in M3s who leave their tow hooks on to try and show everyone make everyone think they were at a track day. It’s embarrassing and tries way too hard.

*Monegasque

I’d be a little more impressed if the “battle scars” were real.  But either way, McLarens don’t really move me.  ND.