scottermonkey-old
Scottermonkey
scottermonkey-old

I understand there are rules against something like this being done.

And I would love it if people talking about the "messy" Sony remote would also mention there is an option to get the app for your phone so you can control the Google TV with your phone. Just seems like if you want to be a journalist you might want to do some research and *try* to be somewhat objective?

I'm confused why you call the inside of this ~computer messy? Are you a hardware / fab designer and you noticed the interface for the FSB is poorly designed? Or are you desperate for headlines? Seriously: Do you spend much time opening up ultraportable devices and comparing how neatly laid out and/or well designed

Sherbet

Yes! I'm glad. So far 3D movies have been mostly disappointing to me and even a little bit painful. This is one piece of "next gen" technology that I wish would slow down and wait for it to be more feasible. And by "more feasible," I mean (a) no special glasses required, (b) wider viewing angle, (c) less chance of

I will not recommend this phone to friends. I was dubious about the small screen but now; sad.

@DefineStatutory: Thank you! I'm installing Chrome to Phone right now!

@barmalei: I see how your lifestyle lends itself more to non-local navigation needs. Mine is opposite. New clients. New friends. New parties. Nice to be able, especially at night, to speak an address into Google's navigation on my Nexus One, tap a few confirmation "buttons," and then that [robotic] voice starts

@Adam Spano: Thanks for the compliment. Can't say I agree. If I were trying to be a pioneer, I would ask for:

OK here is my dream phone, edited. I'm reposting this because I hope some Google, HTC, or Samsung employee sees it and it somehow figures into their plans.

@Scottermonkey: It took away all my "greater than" symbols that were next to all my "=" symbols :)

@blyan-reloaded: I think it depends on the phone you pick. I bought my Nexus One in January and right now if you compare all the specs (including Froyo/Android 2.2) (speed/screen/flexibility/build quality), this phone is still equal to or superior in many ways to some of the newest, including the iPhone 4. So yeah,

@NeoPoliticus: Actually, because of so much CHOICE, Android is doing quite well.

@vein11: Yeah I love my Nexus One but (a) they are no longer for sale, I think? (b) 3.7" screen and Snapdragon processor, while not fully obsolete, are bested by the Samsung Galaxy phones and the Epic.

@tdvx: All it says is there are a wide range of Android phones. The ones in this chart are the highest-end ones. IMHO these are the very best Android phones currently available. Fastest processors, biggest screens, etc. Trust me, if you buy a lesser Android phone, you will be limited to pre 2.2 version of the

Nexus One, *may* have been a "marketing failure" as you say... or not. I don't know what constitutes "marketing failure". Would it be something like $ spent on advertising vs. sales? Or ... ?

Hopefully, this has something to do with rumors that Android 3.0 will preclude carriers and manufacturers adding their custom skins to Android. I haven't tried Motoblur. I've heard good and bad about it. I have tried a client's Samsung Vibrant (based right now on Android 2.1) and really prefer Froyo stock.

How about Supreme Commander?