Yay I love to hear this. While Avatar was fun, I don't believe the 3D aspect added enough to the "experience" to balance out the higher ticket fee, eye strain, and the encumbrance of the glasses. I don't believe we are ready for 3D yet.

Yay hi-rez screen! But 3.5"? When so many other high end smart phones are moving into the 3.7 to 4.3 inch territory where typing and web browsing become easier, why did they keep the sceen so tiny? I might just switch to the EVO.

"... and finally it'll be available for Android phones from today..." <— uhm... it has been available for awhile now on Android phones.

Sad kissing of the apple-shaped cheeks article. What about Skype? This article said virtually nothing about why, technically, this new & unproven technology, "FaceTime," should be adopted by all of Apple's competitors? Oh yeah... it's "open". That's why! That buzzword, "open," is being used as an excuse for so much…

It's telling that the reviewer did not compare screen size and resolution. IMHO this is an important point. 800 x 420 @ 3.7"! And how about the dimensions of the phones? And: Removable battery (y/n), multitasking (y/n), 802.11 n WiFi (y/n), and oh, that little thing like processor speed? If you are going to compare…

@Clapfoot: Agreed. Another site that is dishing out the lies: DailyTech.com.

@Striderhayasa - Can we get some damn m/kb support?!: Thanks so much for clearing these issues up with real facts! I've been using (and loving) my Android G1 for about 9 months now. And yes, via rooting, I have been enjoying Apps-to-SD (with a 16GB SD card) and multitouch. You said it better than I could. It is…

@tomsamson: I remember reading somewhere that [starting] at Android version 1.6 they added a layer to the OS so that screen resolution is independent. My understanding is this gave developers freedom to write to an API that would scale as needed.