Only fucking idiots remember W. fondly. He was and always will be a war criminal.

I can and will call Bush a worse president than Trump. A million people dead from unnecesary wars is far worse than anything Trump ever did. Even if you blame Trump for literally all of the covid deaths. He may have been more embarrassing, but at the end of the day, he didn’t do anything that any other Republican…

Breyer fucking sucks. How can anyone look at what happened with Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, i.e. getting replaced by her polar opposite with the likely outcome that many, if not most, of the advances she contributed to in her career will be reversed, and think “Yeah, makes sense to hold on”?  It’s the height of selfishness. …

I’m kind of expecting some large revamps in some places, but I think I’d still prefer the combat stay mostly the same, but I guess look a little flashier. Fidelity to the original is something I think most fans want, but I can see the dual-wielding lightsaber attack animations looping in my head and it feels a bit…

glass of water take to think rise of skywalker is somehow worse than attack of the clones lol

We bash the prequels because the prequels were bad.

Who is preventing this crisis from being addressed?  

Leave the other words you used in there

One says “Democrats” the other says “DEMOCRATS.” Which words make one more specific than the other?

What do you think just happened? The Supreme Court had an opportunity to stop this law from going into effect, and they didn’t. It has already been challenged, and the challengers lost because there are 5 members of the Supreme Court that want Roe overturned. If they didn’t want Roe overturned, they wouldn’t have…

Short of holding a loved on hostage, putting a gun to his head, or something else equally absurd and illegal, other politicians’ ability to control Joe Manchin may as well be the same their ability to reverse gravity or divide by zero.

This:

So your problem with me saying if Democrats wanted to, they could address this problem, was that I didn’t adequately point out that there are Democrats who don’t want to address this problem? That’s literally what I was saying. Like:

No one anywhere should be backstopping any lawsuit under this law, especially not as a means to get it overturned.  The Supreme Court could have easily put this law on hold.  That they didn’t tells you everything you need to know about what 5 members of the Court think about it’s constitutionality.  It will be upheld.

Lol, what? Maybe you should learn to read, instead of having your first instinct being to defend some of the most powerful people in the world from criticism. After all, your response to me pointing out that Democrats could address this crisis if they wanted to was to....point out that actually the problem is that…

Sorry, I’m sure at this point it’s a “me” thing and not a “you” thing, but I still have no idea what point you’re making.

Okay, but the reason they don’t have the votes is because of DEMOCRATS who aren’t willing to make those votes! That is the point. The failure of the federal government to address this crisis is a failure of DEMOCRATS to address this crisis, because DEMOCRATS are in control of all of the relevant parts of the federal…

Because there aren’t 50 of them in the Senate who want that. Thought we’d covered that math sufficiently.

If Democrats want this, why hasn’t it happened yet?  What the fuck do you think Chuck Schumer’s job is, exactly?

Democrats have enough votes to get rid of the filibuster and codify Roe. They have enough votes to expand the Supreme Court. Maybe before focusing our blame on people who, individually, could not have actually changed the outcome of either one of those elections (although I agree it was stupid, frustrating, and…