schmowtown--disqus
schmow town
schmowtown--disqus

all of her co-workers except for frieda are so over done. they need to tune it down a notch. Everything they say just beats the audience over the head that they're privileged.

I'm sure he is actually racist, but is savvy enough to know that these kind of comments will get reported, spread confusion, and stoke conspiracy. I'm sure his own morals are pretty loosely defined at this point. He's shot up the chain of command pretty quickly, so what he used to view as relevant may seem

I'm not going to pretend to be super knowledgable about this, but isn't China's economic power actually a threat to the US? Like in terms of things that could actually threaten the US's economy, it seems realistic that we should at least be aware of the issue. I still definitely don't trust Bannon but reading this

President Trump wears that outfit when he's golfing. There is no fixing of any printers going on during that time.

ok, good night! Love you!

You're initial comment you stated: "People can protest, people can counter protest. But being violent during a protest is stupid. Not as stupid as being a white supremacist but it's still stupid."

Did he say that they didn't have a permit, or didn't coordinate with local law enforcement? The real meat of the article is that donald trump in not disavowing this behavior, which is functionally the same as supporting it. And as David Dukes twitter response shows, they are taking it that way in no uncertain terms.

The whole argument was more about moral relativism (hanks original comment) and how it "doesn't make either side not-terrible." than it is about free speech. I agree that hitting nazis is bad, but being a nazi is so, so much worse. And you are correct, the people who do instigate violence are playing into their hands,

I have reread it. I have never said anyone is not entitled to free speech, but part of having that freedom comes the burden of knowing when to use it. My initial comment was to question why he was trying to rationalize something he didn't want to rationalize. All I did was ask why.

No again, I have never once condoned violence. Please copy and paste where i am condoning violence into your next response so i can understand where we are not seeing eye to eye. My argument is why are you willing to even make the argument? Are you making the same arguments on articles about gaza? Are you on message

My initial comment was saying that the first amendment doesn't require us to say anything. Taking a side that is not unequivocally agains white nationalism and neonazis makes you complicit in their rhetoric and beliefs. So again, if you hate to even argue a point, then why argue it? What is the value of that thought

There is no both sides, and there is no middle ground. Unless you stand explicitly against white supremacy and Nazism, you are complicit.

If you hate that you have to say anything remotely close to defending literal Nazis, then maybe you just shouldn't. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you have to speak.

I will actually do something unheard of in the Internet and agree with you. That's a really good point. Up till that moment he was just an archetype for Starlord/MCU main characters and that made him feel more like a real person. It was pretty dark.

i think this comment is the winner

Yeah, that thought occurred to me too. Does the thought that there are people out there taking the themes and messages the wrong way (often in ways that i vehemently disagree with) alter how i enjoy the show? I think the answer is…. maybe

perhaps comedy writers…. are insufferable assholes

or if you do need that hero, then you have morty.

This is a really interesting point because, depending on where this season builds to, they could be making the whole "great men are assholes" argument, maybe even comparing him to a figure like steve jobs. Tech genius, unrepentant asshole to those around him. Like they risked killing millions because they don't like

Harmon did say in an interview that he loves Handmaid's Tail…