Explain a universal healthcare schema that can cope with people to duck off and onto enrolment or whatever funding system we use. Hell, how does the IRS cope with all the people who will move out of the country and drive right back in?
scalfin
scfin
No, that’s clearly “late stage capitalism.”
I would note that the left has been doing this for a while.
I would note that the only thing new about this story is that people on the right are doing it this time.
The guy who posted a video mocking a toddler’s tefilin has apologized and will be volunteering at a kosher soup kitchen, though, so they do sometimes make up for it.
I’ve heard it suggested that the people who hate the poor most are the ones who have to interact with them the most or know them best (especially family), I think as the result of there being a great many self-made and refusing-help poor alongside the noble poor people like to talk about. This would be the case here,…
A fuckup that should probably lead to an investigation and likely court martial.
What mechanism can you claim for a story being planted in major papers of record (redundant, I know) in both the United States and United Kingdom other than a conspiracy theory?
But their response wasn’t to kill them all, but just those it perceived to be a direct threat. It fired upon those trying to get over or through the fence, as far as I can gather, rather than the large crowd behind them or urban Gaza.
You do realize that the “striking back” you’re endorsing is the targeted stabbing of pregnant women, right? It’s amazing that that’s what you’re okay with when you’re simultaneously decrying a country firing on suspected militants trying to break into its borders.
I cited the first attack total found on Wikipedia, with most of the attacks listed in the article being corroborated by mainstream news organization from multiple countries. You cannot deny that they happened without claiming a global conspiracy, and we both know who that conspiracy theory would have to blame.
Is thinking a country would act based on recent experience that unreasonable?
The threat can be to other troops or civilians rather than the specific people firing. Otherwise bombers would pretty much always be a war crime.
First thing from google (emphasis google’s):
Do you really think that any public would accept just letting them in to see what they do after all the attacks Palestinians who snuck in in 2015 and 2016 carried out and Hamas claiming at least five (I could have ssworn it was more, but that’s all I can find on a quick googling) of the last set that tried to make it…
Are you denying that the knife intifada never took place and that the 166 stabbings, 89 attempted stabbings, 108 shootings, 47 vehicular rammings, and one vehicle bus bombing between the Octobersof 2015 and 2016? Does that mean you think that the Jews are just controlling the world media, including major American and…
I highly doubt that’s the agenda, as the right wing in Israel is largely Russians who just don’t want to see the buses explode again (as they tended to when they arrived) and Mizrahim who both see voting right as a way to stick it to the liberal parties they feel discriminated against them and expelling the other side…
“Commensurate force” doesn’t actually refer to the arms of the opposition, though, hence the use of tanks and armored vehicles in Iraq, but rather to what’s needed to protect your people, military or civilian, from being killed. In this case, Israel is acting under the assumption that the people trying to break…
It’s also half true, as any reporter trying to operate in Gaza has to do so under direct Hamas control. There have been several accounts of reporters being made to wait while Hamas staged or scrubbed a scene (ushering the rocketeers away and herding in some cute moppets) before being allowed to film.