AT&T Global Network Operations Center

reason that looks so bad is 'cause the source material was not shot at higher frame rates (almost none is right now) and the TV interpolates; I agree, the interpolated frames suck. If you saw something shot in 1080p240 and *displayed* at 240fps, it would look AWESOME I can promise.

You could envision a drifting neutron star of about 20 miles in diameter being "captured" by a "real" star and taking up an orbit around that star... sort of becoming a planet; let's call it a planet! That neutron star could rotate on its axis more than 500 times a second. This small star has as much mass as a big…

it can travel at MUCH slower speed than 'c,' too ;)

Isn't it fascinating that something (a photon) could "bounce" around for thousands of miles in fractions of a second inside a small box and not slow down... I think I can conceptualize that—but can I really?

If the sender & receiver have an iPhone, the texts and pics and videos are sent over wifi, preferentially, when available. Or, you might use WhatsApp to accomplish the same thing.

To our customers,

Ergo, all those who don't ever plus... are perpetually nonplussed.

I don't even play the viola, so no help for me there :(

I've always simply lodged my iPhone in my rectum for protection and induced peristalsis when I need to use it or whatever. No scratches, no worries. And yes, I keep it on vibrate mode.

And what about live traffic? For me this is one of the best features of Google maps on the iPhone. Does iOS 6 have it?

This looks like the worst mistake I've seen Apple make in a long time.

HDMI-in works spectacularly shittily in the TouchSmarts (i.e., can't watch a video-in-window—it must be full screen, and it does not integrate with Media Center). Hope it works better here.

In terms of film villains and their villainous lies, this ranks as the best of all time (not sci-fi but certainly fantastical!).

"This Stealthly Analog Smartwatch Can Be Your Little Secret"

ALL YOUR FLYING BUDDY ARE BELONG TO US

And yet you and I use them as monitors, and the companies sell them :)

Gotta read those specs; the devil's in the details.

That's a very usable PPI range... why? Because we employ it in certain applications. Large screen monitors (i.e., a 40" 1920x1080 display, like in this video) can be very useful & non-crap. I agree that a ~90 foot screen would be non-usable in far more instances.

Nah, 2560 x 1080 is fine at "almost" any size as a monitor, depends on the use context and personal preferences. "Almost" is a relative term, as is "absolute crap." ;) Could I interest you in absolute crap 70" or 80" monitors?…