scarbrtj
scarbrtj
scarbrtj

I would agree with you if I understood it.

I'm going to automatically respect & listen to anyone who pronounces "square root" as square RUHT, electronic rapscallion or not.

I am not sure. The Tessarakonteres had a displacement of about 5000 tons, fully loaded with about 6000-7000 crew; it was powered by 4000 humans rowing oars. An aircraft carrier has a displacement of about 100000 tons. The F-414 generates a fair amount of force and horsepower. If it can generate 20x more force than

The jet engine will provide more measurable speed/acceleration if the ship engines aren't engaged, less if they are engaged to full output (because you're needing more jet engine power to overcome the increasing water-caused drag at ship engine full output); either way, the increased speed of the ship will certainly

Nice job Zach! (And it would be good to have a link to Zach's profile hint hint.)

Now playing

Guys... there are a few two-headed creatures living in your testicles right this moment.

Now playing

America was bombed by Japan in World War II... and American soil was occupied by Japan, too:

How is net tree growth adding more CO2 to "a closed loop" (which I assume you mean is the carbon cycle)? If earth's net biomass increases, that equals less CO2 in the atmosphere. The carbon in the carbon cycle is neither created or destroyed; it's either atmospheric, lithospheric, hydrospheric, or biospheric. Net new

But, more trees = lots less CO2 in the atmosphere. Less CO2 = less greenhouse effect.

Now playing

That much new plant life will scrub a lot of CO2 out of the atmosphere.

I think they reflect solar radiation; ice packs/tundra don't play a strong enough heat-absorptive role for their destruction to accelerate global warming. If they were truly heat-absorbing, their destruction would actually mean less heat absorption leading to less severe & efficient global warming.

Sorry. This is the most secure phone on Earth.

I've heard this mentioned before. But... the laws of physics will allow for all the information we have now to be transmitted into the future, thus future astronomers will be quite able to observe the stars in the sky we see now. They just won't use telescopes. In the daytime, I can see no stars outside, but I can see

Now playing

The government/DoJ hums this song in their heads at moments like this.

I will certainly invite my girlfriends Delores, Aretha, Bovary, Gipple, Loleola and Mulva over to look at my beautiful, new Pagina.