sassinak11
Sassinak11
sassinak11

You might want to adjust your statement a bit... Women are CONVICTED at a rate of 2% for murders.. Convicted and Committed are two different things.. Historically the courts have been rather lenient with women with regards conviction (especially in cases of domestic violence/death... assuming you are white).

So we

No, they believe in abortions for some (the rich) and Education for some (the rich).. and everyone else gets a big fat zero. Remember the Department of education’s job (and by extension public education in general) is to ensure educational equality for all and to a large extent ensure that everyone has an educational

You realize this is a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation right?.. That the only way to not dilute the pool is to run part of the group.. and then switch later..

And while legally that would work.. it would almost guarantee a single term.. since they would be spending most of their time fighting 2 other

Sad but most likely true... I wish someone WOULD try that.. I bet for at least 1-2% of the population.. it would work.. 

Its a fantasy in the long term.... in the short term with the right person, it can be quite good.. but no one rules forever.. and the historically the next person in the seat is worse.. and the 3rd person is trash making the whole thing a disaster. And the problem is once that bottle for a

Actually I believe they know what the majority of US citizens want.. The problem there is 2 fold. 1: Some percentage wants these things as long as “others” don’t get it (this I have mine, fuck you attitude we see).. Insert whatever “favourite” group you want.. (Black, Hispanic, LBGTQ+, Women, etc...). and 2: Gaining

I’m confused.. is she a demonic whore, or a demonic fake?.. or a Fake Whore?.. I mean to be fair they all apply.. but I’m curious which exact two words was she aiming for.. or was that slash intended to be a comma?

The problem with Cheato is he knows ultimately that he can bend reality to his version by repeating a lie often enough that it becomes a sort of truth. We have seen this issue time and time again, where something it is demonstratively false.. proven, video tapes, DNA scans, and hell, his own admission on tape and yet

And they don’t realize (or maybe they do) that Porn/Erotica has been one of the main drivers of technological innovation in the last 100 years (outside of the military) From increasing bandwidth on the internet, to the old VCR vs. Betamax debate and even the early printing presses.. a lot of technological innovation

Don’t you mean earth certificate?

But that’s just it.. Open AI (who is a R&D Firm by the way, not a commercial entity) isn’t out there advertising/selling their “product” as a solution or something to be used by everyone.. In fact, I would say they are closer to Google in the perpetual beta with no advertising to say “use our product”. People are

It depends on the state and the interpretation of that opinion.. Remember, Stand your ground laws are based on OPINION.. not a clearly defined “fact”.. You can literally have 2 people experiencing the same situation and one will be “fearful” for their life and so feel justified in using deadly force and another that

Absurd, but sadly accurate. Because SYG pretty much turns what should be an open/shut case into a matter of opinion in which the police have no jurisdiction over. So they have to punt it to the AG and other entities that then have to judge the matter of opinion.

It means Murder is “perfectly ok” so long as you have a

Even when watching movies at home, its on more for background noise while I’m doing other tasks/work... Work, family, research, etc.. take up the bulk of the my time.. so its hard to find a slot that makes sense.. (optimally midnight - 02:00 is ideal for me, but rare to find a theater that is open that late).  Same

In many ways it is... If their terms (which are known in advance) indiciate the limits of what their can/are doing.. And someone uses it outside of those limits, they are typically not held liable.

Its like a microwave that says: Don’t use it for metal instruments, and YOU use it with metal and it burns down your

And that is your right.. I won’t be seeing it in the theater, not because of Miller, but because I have not set foot in a theater for 10-15 years.. and while this may benefit from a larger screen.. I simply lack the time disconnect for 2+ hours.  However if I did, I would go see it.. I have no problem separating the

Well, Journalism teaches one to separately cross reference any sources or stated materials to make sure the details are sound.  In AI, my main concern isn’t “should you rely on it”... (as know people will accept anything that makes their lives/jobs easier even if the failure rate is high).. what I worry is the

In the Encyclopedia Britania’s case, they are considered a reference source and make no claims (one way or another) about the accuracy of information but considering they are widely sourced and distributed, it would be “harmful” to others if defamation appeared in their books/materials.

ChatGPT actually states with a

No, that’s what her lawyer and the Florida legal system will do..

Not necessarily.. for example.. both my father and I gag on things like cream of wheat and Oatmeal (both of which have a mucosal texture we find off-putting to say the least).. but its also the viscosity of that texture in conjunction with the “slime” factor that is the trigger.. I can eat a raw egg, or sunny side