I think you misspelled Republican.. 

You gotta do what’s right even if you think it might be wrong.

I disagree.. a lot of these shills genuinely believe the lies they tell.. (in their world view, its not a lie) because they play the game that most republicans do.. which is, “my perspective/experience is THE ONLY perspective/experience and anything that conflicts with that must be a deficiency of others” Ignoring…

I’m going to say Ambien... that seems to be the goto excuse right behind “my statements were taken out of context”.

I think you are thinking to small, they would push him for congress and then towards the presidency.

Sadly it reflects the various groups.. and social media’s impact on distrust of “traditional” news/media.

Fox viewers are usually staunch republicans/conservatives who couldn’t loose people even if they actually admitted they lied (hint: they did). Because typical of most republicans/conservatives, they are firmly in a…

Actually its by design..

They create a boogie “man” in over the LGBTQ community because

My money is on the shooters being able to sue.. I can see something about “Freedom of expression” and allowing the “Bullet Americans” to have their say.

The issue isn’t so much who MIGHT get out.. but rather, there is simply no attempt at making prisoners better.. so those that to get out lack any skills/support to actually BE better, and people will always take the path of least resistance and crime is something they know..

Trump’s IQ?

Correct...

I agree, the museum should have asked her to leave..

Then you obviously have NOT been in a museum.. Almost all museums are considered “quiet” spaces.. They are not public spaces like the park (where shy of actions that are considered a legal public nuisance, you an do whatever you want), but rather a “private” (really semi-public) spaces where the museum (or…

Considering the position most republicans are espousing, this may not be the joke you are making it out to be.  There is a very real possibility that such people may be put into work camps (or their children if they are physically unable to work).

With the way the law is written, its really up to the accuser and the judge to determine the lawsuit and its merit.. I mean you could literally be a guy with long hair and someone could claim “drag” or “non-masculine features in public with kids possibly present” and be sued.

But you KNOW how the internet and such click-bate works.. the word “abuser” are going to forever be attached to his name regardless of any strong evidence that EVERY comment about him is false. It doesn’t matter if the police clear his name.. it almost doesn’t matter if the woman in question does a press conference…

Sadly past/historical characterizations are almost impossible to (dis)prove and so it basically lobs a bomb into this situation that’s difficult to defend against.

Sadly that is how social media works these days... ANY action is just chum in the water for those that want to hate or prove a point.. and as you said, no matter the legal outcome, he’s screwed.. and will be a “sensitive” commodity where future projects will be weighed less on his abilities and more about the public…

Why can’t it be a happy coincidence.. his love of Zorro (the swashbuckling rouge) and he just happens to also be romantically (alleged) linked with someone with a Z in their name.

A pure coinkydink in my book.

Then the sheriff’s office was correct, it WAS an animal.. a humanoid one (Goodoldboyists Hillbillian Whiteboyist) .. they just never specified what species..