It sounded like “terrible f**king referee,” which is a little nicer when you really think about it.
Is it too early for the “Vote for Dame” campaign?
(I think a reasonable person could agree that this was a great play. Some jerk chimed in to say that it wasn’t that great for whatever reason, and they were roundly criticized by others, including me. There was a not-so-lively back-and-forth between the two of us, and I should have realized much earlier that it wasn’t…
Well, that was infuriating to watch.
Not discussing this further with you just tossing you a bit of rope.
This is from your first—and, again, dumb and needlessly contrarian (hereafter: ‘DANC’)—post:
+1 bait-and-switch
The problem wasn’t that we didn’t understand your post, friend—the problem was that you wrote something really dumb and needlessly contrarian. And then you tried to pretend as if you hadn’t done that, as if we couldn’t all see what you’d just written.
I applaud her effort.
Right?! Even if I could make that kind of play (I couldn’t), I would be sprawled on the floor for a good bit, not springing back up like a f**king ninja to keep the rally going.
Dude, “multiple individuals” is literally the definition of a ‘collective.’
Aggie-nizing.
Wondering what if is blissfully pointless when there are far too many hypotheticals are needed to engineer the win that makes it worth your while.
Eyedohgetit.
Apparently it’s pronounced “BEH-third,” but I propose we all continue to act as if it sounds like it’s spelled.
Just sent a video link to one of my best friends—we’ve been buddies since the very first day of middle school. The video features a guy who looks like an evil Moldovan version of our mutual friend from (you guessed it) middle school.
So there.
(Also, A Nation of Millions is the first rap album I ever owned and it’s…