Username checks out.

Walk me through how you could question if this was an assault, post a definition of assault that with 100% certainty confirms that yes indeed it was, then say “that was hardly an assault.”

BOO! BOO!

Ha ha, okay. Real slim branch you seem to want to walk out on.

How about for the sake of argument we say they meant what they said?

Oh, it’s clearly the same guy, and I recognized the style even before googling the name. This town needs a better brand of troll.

Seems like he used to pick more clever names than just literally the name of a tomato variety, though.

GUESS WHO’S IN THE COMMENTS, EVERYBODY!!!

Ah, got it. Well, in keeping with the theme, just thought I’d throw in my two cents.

Theory falls apart a bit when it’s not the headline, man.

“And I thought, if these dodos have figured it out, surely I can find a way.”

Literally the reason I decided to go to law school. 

I’m now legitimately curious if the head of 7-11 recently said something critical of Trump.

That’s fine, except for the third one, where I have to once again point out that you’re continuing to read way past what I or anyone else in this thread ever said.

But that would reduce internet traffic by 90%, so come on, be reasonable.

Only secondhand, and my understanding is that it’s somewhere between “really easy” and “completely impossible,” just as this would be.

The funniest part is that it seems like we basically agree that a person in 1900 scoffing at the idea that we’d ever as a nation transition to gas-powered vehicles would sound as foolish as a person today scoffing that we’ll ever transition to electric vehicles.

Rare and interesting to meet a functioning illiterate. Congrats to you on doing okay despite the adversity.

I did read both, but I’m starting to think you didn’t. (edit: I love it. “Maybe not as hard as we thought.” “It’s not an intractable problem. “HEY THESE GUYS ARE SAYING IT’S EASY!!!”)

No fucking shit it won’t be easy. Where in this discussion was that said?