sarcasmagasm
sarcasmagasm
sarcasmagasm

Seriously... how are people missing this issue?

Already have black flag and unity for PC, not interested in basketball.
Still not interested in the Xbox One. OR the PS4 for that matter.

Already have black flag and unity for PC, not interested in basketball.
Still not interested in the Xbox One. OR

It’s not like they just copied-and-pasted him from Melee. They certainly had a starting point and knew in concept what his moves would be (except for his Final Smash, which they created from scratch), what the animations would look like, and what his model would look like. But they still had to actually create all

Unfortunately that ship has pretty much sailed, and there are those, including many game developers, who want to at least see some games reach that level and there are those out there who want to write about games at that level. Why shouldn't they be allowed to? If gaming is going to grow as an industry (which

We've just all sunk into this pit of nastiness. Everyone seems to be trolling one another then retreating to their echo-chambers for reaffirmation. It's devolved to 4th grade level nonsense. YOU'RE THE POOPY HEAD w/big words. And no one, from the GG'ers, anti-GG'ers, oppurtunists on both sides, gamers in general,

Only a tiny percentage of coverage really ever goes/ went to indie though unless you're counting indie-centric sites. Most indie games don't even really get reviews (and man is this aggravating if you're trying to figure out if some interesting looking game is actually any good.) The overwhelming portion of this

Which all sounds cool until you get to the part where GG decided to collectively not give a crap about the Shadows of Mordor thing and how it has always and still is way more focused on scrutinizing how the gaming press handles indies instead of AAA publishers which have a long and storied history of trying to buy

That's fine, but the problem is that, unlike feminists where, with the exception of RadFem crazies, all feminists are working towards the same goal and the differences are over how to reach that goal, GamerGate has become about so many things. Even most of the rational GamerGaters I've interacted with still see the

The issue was that all of the motion control options are, by nature, fairly imprecise for a variety of games. The racing wheel was one of the big selling points for the Wii, for example, but you could be a better and more precise driver on Wii games by using the gamepad attachment. Kinect motion controls were

Motion control will have a place just as soon as the latency between input and screen response is difficult to measure, like it is for a wireless mouse. The Wiimote has a lot of latency, which fortunately didn't much matter to the casual market invented by that console. Although the Move's accuracy is good, its

Patriarchal social norms are certainly damaging to anyone who doesn't fit the ascribed molds, but creating a bunch of new molds and labels for different categories of people to suite their specific identity doesn't seem like a very good solution. It's just an expansion of what identities are viewed as "acceptable",

I also find this line of questioning to be of value, considering that I myself, before settling on a trans identity, wandered down the path of questioning my mental status, and I seem to have autistic "traits" (though most people who know me would say otherwise, not knowing my private life). I wonder if there is any

I actually think it's hard to tell if his subjects were trans women or not, thanks to his 1980s-era thinking. He seems to assert that "real" trans women are attracted to men, much like the medical gatekeepers of the time did. It'd be interesting to see how these folks would describe their narratives in 2014.

Geez I hate supporting bad science. But in fairness to the authors of the article, at no point do they conflate mental illness with sanity. Nor do they use the words "sane" or "insane".

Umm, do you not understand how the prosecution of criminals works? I mean, not just in Batman but in the real world? The people don't vote on individual cases to figure out who should be executed or not. They vote on laws to allow it or not which includes extreme cases like The Jokers. If they wanted to they could

Me on Facebook in response to my Aunt posting "If it were reversed, this never would have been an issue" (This was part of a LIKE page for Bring Paula Back!)