sarcasmagasm
sarcasmagasm
sarcasmagasm

Easiest way to win the console race ? Have no competition.

I don't necessarily disagree with Sarkeesians assertion that there is a lot of sexist tropes in video games myself, but I do have some criticisms of arguments that she makes about the impact of it on people in parts and culture as a whole.

There was the whole skill system as well, which kind of made the combat a bit more complex than the four basics. However, at the same time, the skill system is really straight forward, simple as investing skill points in a skill category until you unlock the next skill in said category.

I know a person can't use logic to understand their own gender identity, it is after all, feelings and intuition that are the foundations of it. I just meant that it would seem logical from an rudimentary understanding of human psychological development, that a child would need to have a recognition of genders before

I agree too that the word doesn't inherently imply a hostile intent, but it still gained that implication colloquially. Regardless of whether or not you are being overtly academic, you are posting on a site that, in itself, is not overtly academic and is being read by an audience that is not reading it as academic.

While I do not doubt you have had a gender identity for as long as you can remember, I do doubt that there was never a time in your life you were lacking a gender identity. It would just seem illogical, to me, for one to be able to consciously recognize a gender identity for themselves without first having some sort

That's true, but still, LGBTQ characters who are NOT villains are even better.

I don't think the status of the writer's sexual orientation is as important as how the portrayal is handled. If someone had not read this article or the link this article cites, would they know that when they watch it ? Would the sexual orientation of the writer even matter to most who will see it ?

If your original reply to UberOmega is any indication, then the distinction is definitely not obvious. "Oppressor" is a word with a lot of baggage to it that would seem to imply a choice on the part of the one labeled as such. Using the word by itself implies a hostile intent on the part of the speaker, which makes

Does it not help to distinguish between passive oppression by merely having privilege and actively oppressing via actions one chooses to make ?

>I'd be curious to hear from more people, because I've wondered about this.

>implying steam greenlight is the only way to get homebrew games on PCan m

For you first problem, I apologize for the density of my sentences. I tend to write like that if I do not take time to proofread before posting.

I'm a little bit confused how I can be more unclear at this point when I made my intentions pretty straight forward a few replies back. I was hoping for a bit of a discussion on the topic of this article in the context of those trans people whose narratives lack the key element as presented in the article - that being

I don't really think you are disagreeing with me, I think I am just struggling to properly express myself.

I am confused. Acknowledging that the experiences and story of those trans individuals who's experiences are not standard or classic, does not really require that you tell anyone else's story for them. It just a simple acknowledgement that one's experiences are not uniform.

This makes sense to me and I agree that it is perfectly possible for trans women to have a culturally feminine socialization. However, forgive me if I do not know what is meant by the "TERF Myth", I am not familiar with much of the terminology.

I find this article interesting, but I have a bit of a problem with it and a question to go with it as well.

Don't worry, I knew you were not critiquing my response. I just felt like adding a comment of my own. :)

After reading sissyspaseship's response you referenced, I find they did a much better job articulating a point I was hoping to articulate in some of my response here.