“If Evita could be transformed into a Madonna”... this guy is a prophet.

Maybe not, I don’t know; I just meant to offer an interpretation of what I thought the guy meant.

“Only friend, total loser: already, this feels like a pretty dramatic rewriting of Virginia Woolf’s Chloe and Olivia. For we see here that, while their relationship may demand a metaphorical—and often literal—room of its own,” What is this?

I think he means that he referred to himself as a male and other people took offense. Hence, you can define yourself as whatever, but he also gets to define himself as male. I can see how that would be irritating, as adults, to be lectured on the proper recital of nomenclature. It certainly cannot be called a…

Not only that, think of how many minorities in this country would easily slide into the conservative side if it weren’t for the Republicans still winking at nodding at so many of the white racists in this country. Personally, I’d wager most people naturally incline toward some sort of conservatism.

“Ahh, yes. Herein lies the key: fully and flagrantly objectify your wife. Imagine her as a faceless orifice, a sex doll to be used in your Christian ejaculatory efforts. She started it, after all.” I’m still laughing at and admiring these three wonderful sentences.

I’d wager a huge percentage of those athletes would never even get into those universities without the sports, and I mean they wouldn’t come close to qualifying academically. It’s a noble sentiment to say that education can unlock future success for them, but they are in no position to exploit that. Forgetting even…

Exactly why we aren’t sticking you at QB.

It is also art that needs to be mocked and laughed at.

Well and the nobles would ransom each other. They still generally slaughtered the peasants they captured.

So, you’re a Donald Trump fan?

This is brilliant. You opened my eyes to the fact that Drew Magary is a far more articulate Homer Simpson. No wonder I like him so much.

“Mr. Baseball is a baseball historian and fan,” but not, evidently, a writer. However, a person who cannot write teaching “advanced dialectical history” certainly seems plausible. But seriously, is this supposed to be a parody of some specific baseball writer?

Well, it is medieval knights in space based not he work of the fourth rate Joseph Campbell. The best thing about Star Wars is Space Balls.

It does make sense, though. Now he that is safely ensconced at the worldwide leader, he has to present a bourgeoisie sensibility, and I wouldn’t doubt the sincerity of his conversion either. Football players make nice money, but Ray seems astute enough to now where the real money and power resides.

Once again, you fail with words.

A Kardashian gif, a stunning riposte. The nearly immovable countenance of Kim is trying to express something, of that I have no doubt. Still, the inability to do anything except slightly nod and open her eyes leaves one clamoring for an arched eyebrow, a frown, a wry smile, or indeed, anything that could be construed…

Calm myself? For writing a response? But I guess that is your go to rhetorical move, as you just used it in your post I responded to as well. And “any of that other shit?” It is only my experience, but usually the person using profanities is the one losing their temper, so heal thyself physician.

Chait is a complete hack. Do you read him? After a few columns, you don’t need to anymore as once you know the topic, you know exactly what he will say. Charter schools = good. centrist democrats = good.

So Erin Ryan thinks the bank bailout was worth it because some clerks didn’t lose their jobs? All those clerks at Goldman Sacks? And really, that is your argument?