saoirseronantheaccuser
SaoirseRonantheAccuser
saoirseronantheaccuser

ding ding ding ding ding

I thought the exact same thing about my first few Lucio matches. I think it’s pretty normal.

One is a city and the other two are literally required to be there.

The first paragraph you wrote is true, and her biggest weakness. Though, of course, Trump hardly seems any better there.

The validity of those emails was absolutely questioned when they first started coming out as people noted that the hackers could have modified things before leaking them.

Everything Kellyanne Conway says and does just makes me crave an insane satirical biopic about her where she’s played by Kaitlin Olson in full “Dee and Dennis Go On Welfare” mode.

It’s a YouTube series where they pedantically pick apart tiny mistakes - and often things that aren’t even mistakes, they just aren’t paying attention - in a goofy voice and when they’re called on how much shit they’re just making up, they’re like, “Um, it’s all just a JOKE okay, it doesn’t matter what we say.”

There are hints in game that she isn’t quite as impassive about Gerard as she’d like people to believe. For instance,

THANK GOODNESS WE DIDN’T ELECT SOMEONE WHO WAS ACCUSED OF EXACTLY FUCKING THIS BUT WHO IT TURNS OUT DIDN’T ACTUALLY DO IT.

Nothing sums up the Democrats this year better than a bunch of people making an utterly meaningless statement with their electoral college votes so they can feel just sooooooooo ideologically pure while an idiot authoritarian takes actual power.

I feel like the first season of THE LAST MAN ON EARTH actually did a really great job of basically giving us this exact character and making him every bit the conceited, self-absorbed monster that kind of guy would really be. I’m disappointed that the movie chickened out where a friggin’ Fox sitcom didn’t.

Nah, Blizz was right on this one, it’s a nice skin with a great effect. The players are just inexplicably whiny.

Yes, it does. Any skin that changes the character’s animations or voice lines has, thus far, been legendary. This meets those criteria.

That’s totally fair! But then, wouldn’t it make more sense to make anti-face-covering laws, more broadly? As of right now, I think the only one they have is preventing face coverings during public demonstrations. I don’t think such a law would be a terribly useful one and it would be dangerously easy to fall into a

You are history’s greatest monster.

I definitely agree that the rigid religious strictures that created this system make it a troublesome issue. How do we know if they genuinely want to be wearing it, or if they are in fear for their lives if they don’t, or if there’s a ‘stockholm syndrome” as you posit? We can’t. And we can’t effectively make laws on

Hi! I was wondering where you got your quote about burkas being empowering? I don’t recall saying anything of the sort, which makes it seem like a weird response to my comment.

The general idea - basically, government should stay out of life except for in the situations where literally nothing else works - wasn’t inherently a terrible one, and there are still a few areas where it makes varying degrees of sense. The problem we see today arose with Nixon/Reagan, who explicitly tried to

Some don’t. Some do. You don’t make women more free by taking away their rights to choose what to wear, you just change the restriction.

The fact that it should be the women’s choice.