right but then if the law is 80 inches or wider why are they not standard on SRW 350s and 250s which are exactly 80 inches

right but if the law is 80 inches or wider why are they optional at all on F250s/350SRWs? thats what the article is missing, why they arent required on trucks that seemingly meet the 80 inches requirement

nope, if you uncheck that box it removes the lights entirely from the roof

not aftermarket, just a base model mirror

you can if its a SRW truck, on the dually it doesnt even have a check box. it just says standard

ford does not throw them on all 350s, on the single rear wheel its an option too. and if the law is 80 inches or wider the f250s would be included in that. the F250 and F350 SWR are both 80 inches wide exactly

i think on single rear wheel trucks its an option, thats how ford does it. and duallies they come standard. but then it leads me to believe it has nothing to do with the width of the truck being over 80 inches cause the F250 and 350 are both at 80 and its only an option.

get out of here with that metric bullshit haha

on the 350 SRW they are optional, only standard on the 350 and up duallys

youre right, i just went and played with the configurer and its 95 dollars to add them to the F250/350 SRW and Standard on the Dually. so the government must not care THAT much about this “law”

I thought these were optional? cause i believe in the build configurator for the F250 and the Ram 2500 it was an option to have them

too close to chicago, the NHL is still the 4th largest sports league in the country behind the NFL, MLB, and NBA. the blackhawks wouldnt want any of that encroaching in on there territory considering a lot of southern wisconsin already roots for the blackhawks or predators thanks to the admirals 

too close to chicago

AWD will always be better than FWD

yeah my cooper AT tires are M+S rated with the 3 peak symbol and they have yet to fail me and my explorer

sorry i guess i misunderstood your post

yeah but in two years those Z4s will still only have a straight 6 with under 400 HP while the F-Type will depreciate further, still be cheaper, and STILL have a V8 with over 500 HP. its still the better buy

i mean is it though? would you rather have a straight 6 with ALMOST 400hp for 64k OR a slightly pre-owned model with under 20k miles and over 500 HP with a V8 for 10k dollars less. AND you avoid a lot of those safety nannies in the bmw

sooooo we shouldnt be happy about a 6 MPG combined jump in 15 years in a truck? im confused do we not like progress? do we want to go back to 16 mpg combined scores?

oh boy a turbo gas engine that will absolutely get better gas mileage than my current N/A V6. quit shitting on progress. the v6 rangers 15 years ago were lucky to get 16 combined