sammysung
sammysung
sammysung

Even though I know it's all premeditated PR (usually CAA, who owns People rag these days) this year's cover actually makes sense, unlike the hilarious Goopyth Paltrow cover from last year that Stephen Huvane wrangeled.

Why is Dr Oz on this list? He alone makes all the other transgressions you listed almost forgivable. Except letting Jennifer Aniston and her pr flack (who's bro was Oprah's then pr guy) craft a weepy poor pitiful image for bitter jealous women everywhere to rally around post her split from a then demonized Brad Pitt

I bet u get tired of correcting people dont you jen? Lol

Actually it really wasn't..went on to gross 300 mil worldwide. But like everything surrounding Angelina human lightening bolt it got taken to extremes when people saw an opportunity. It didn't help that Depp decided to play his character as a fat dopey schlub opposite the most beautiful woman onscreen - him being all

MM blew my mind way back in 'a time to kill.' Which is why the kate hudson years were such a tragedy for me.

At first I had no idea who you were talking about. That's how incomprehensible it is Brad Pitt was ever with a lightweight mediocre tv schmoe and average tv cheese head like Aniston. I'm young and that was olden dayz. That said, what kind of cat lady takes up the mantle of outrage and betrayal for a woman who is on

excuse me - what bullshit is this? What does it even mean? Who da fuck would want to look like paltrow or aniston? Did he get a dozen nose jobs and a bouffant layer cut? Does he ice his nipples before his scenes? Me confused.

Bam. +100

Um, how dumb are you? First of all, since she admitted it, it's a fact not a "stereotype," that she was a then unknown, sleeping with the CEO of the network. Secondly, if a terrible unfunny male comic said he was boning the CEO of a network right before he got his own show, I'd say the same damn thing. I get that for

Yeah, as if Chelsea would have chosen a Kardashian to host her show if she was in charge. Girl, bye.

I'm a girl you dumb bitch. Bye.

You make no sense. At some point you'll realize you're defending an awful toxic racist hack and maybe feel bad and stupid (or not!). That said, obviously there is a difference between Handler and other comics: they're funny and she isn't. If you want to tout her brandi Glanville book sales and e! Cable talker as

Oh dear, someone missed school that day, eh genius? Double for quotes, single for thoughts or, terms with particular meanings that are unique to a subject are often enclosed in single quotation marks.

Declining ratings for Handler. Let's just say everything she touches turns to mildew shall we? When she started she had 4 shows on e! Now, in less than 9 mos. she will have ZERO. Hello. This was not Handler's decision hon. lol (By the way Rivers show, The Fashion Police is the show that gets the biggest ratings, next

Your comment doesn't even make sense especially since I'm a woman, and Handler is the biggest most hateful vile misogynist out there. From calling women c-words, to attacking them for their sexual agency, to her racist ridicule (of children) none of it funny, all of it toxic and ugly. Yeah. I find it hysterical you're

If by 'successful' you mean she could get booked into Hattie's laugh shack in Missoula Montana on alternate thursdays along with my Uncle Cletus...um ok...but no one outside of whatever bumfck club she open mic'd, knew who the fuck she was.

So..let me get this straight. .if..oh..say Handler's nemesis Kim Kardashian released a sex tape to get people interested (as Chelsea did...yeah Google it), then fcked the head of the network that would eventually giver her a late night slot...you'd be the absolute first one insisting she's a success ONLY because of

On demand. That will be interesting. If she stays true to form she'll just name drop 'Angelina Jolie,' and tease the latest bizarre unhinged bitter attack on her to get subscribers. Lol

I think the poster is confused because you're talking out of your ass. I actually don't mind offensive when it's funny. Conversely, Chelsea Handler is as funny as a burlap bag of dead rotting puppies. Plus, a number of people, in the glaring absence of anything remotely humorous, also find her racist.

Only a LOT less funny than Martha. ..and there lies the problem.