Fair enough.

Inherently, I see what you're saying, but my point was that the perception is often unreasonable. This article is a great example.

Exactly. Any perceived inequality is followed by some sort of investigation/inevitable anger. This trope is so tiresome on the internet these days.

Groovy!

Good. Push the poor out into the ocean, if possible.

Agreed.

And now you have double-posted! Congrats!

Delicious!

Heard Patton Oswalt's voice. Immediately sold!

Good Old Floppy Bird.

REE-HEE-HEE-HEEEEAALLLYYY?

My goodness, that man has not aged a day. Like the tomes of old.

That picture of Joss with the Cornetto cone is the most troubling news to come out of this. I originally thought that this was just a spat between Wright and others involved on the project (Edgar seems like a great guy, but he's only directed one adaptation, and from what I can tell from the Scott Pilgrim…

I think that this is SORT OF true. I don't even have delusions, but I also don't think they could maintain a great director without giving them some creativity, or letting them be themselves. Word has it that Marvel told James Gunn that Guardians wasn't James Gunn-y enough, so I really think that a bit of this falls…

I really wonder who to fault in this case. Marvel has been known to be hard-nosed concerning the MCU, but who can blame their judgement calls in the past (save a few)? Edgar Wright seems like the nicest, easy going guy on planet earth, and I absolutely love everything he has released, but maybe he's difficult to…

In terms of 2001-ishness, Cuaron would be Kubrick's virtual successor. I'm in.

Looks very much like The Grand Budapest Hotel.

Not quite. The brevity or quickness of the statement does not necessarily diminish the content. I understand you may not have liked it, but dismissing it as uneducated is pretty worthless and frankly, predictable. You're better than that.

Call it knee-jerk, but don't call it naive.

Holy fuck, you're old.