The FCC has no jurisdiction over cable networks. Fox News doesn’t have any kind of license for the FCC to yank.

I think a big part of why this guy is not taken as speaking in good faith is that he’s appearing on the network that directly influenced the shooter. If he’s not going to directly and bluntly call that network out, anything else he has to say is just not worth listening to.

And yet, the shooter’s manifesto is a clear copy/paste of Tucker Carlson’s White Power Hour, and they won’t do a thing to reel him in.

How does one be “respectful” when saying that you don’t deserve rights?

“pro-respect”

But this isn’t “remaining neutral”. This is giving aid to those who don’t believe that women deserve bodily autonomy rights. There literally is no “neutral” in the debate between whether someone should have rights or not.

No, and that’s a complete horseshit argument. Enshrining the right to abortion in the law would not compel anyone to have an abortion.

Again no, there are not.

There are literally no “Pro-Life people who have no problem with Roe v. Wade or Planned Parenthood.” The entire point of being pro life is that you are against those things.

“Also, to be clear, I’m not even defending this shit,”

That will never happen.

“Regarding NFTs, there is definitely immediate benefits with small merchants no longer need to manage their own database”

I guarantee you we won’t, because why the fuck would they want a “percentage” when they could get the full amount by making you buy a fresh license?

It very much does mean that NFTs are useless, because they don’t provide any benefit over the other ways of doing them.

“the benefit of the cloud servers was they are distributed? but you’ll dook on a blockchain claim to decentralization?”

No, you want propaganda. A reporter’s job is not to state the “benefits of NFTs.” Their job is to report the truth. And the truth of the matter is, there are no uses for NFTs that are not better handled than the way things are.

“One of the biggest things that NFT’s are great for are online digital contracts”

If Fortnite wanted you to be able to resell skins, you’d be able to resell skins. As you pointed out, Steam has done this for quite some time, and done so without NFTs.

“This is a reductionist argument that doesn’t take into account the benefits of NFTs”

“just like how when cloud servers first started, it doesn’t do anything that monolithic servers can’t already do.”