Well, over 650 people have been charged with their involvement, and 105 have pled guilty so far.

They are? Have you not seen the massive amount of arraignments and trials for the people involved in 1/6?

Are the filters a standard size? Can I swap out the filters for ones that capture organic vapors? I do resin printing, and for that, regular N95s aren’t sufficient for the VOCs from the resin.

Proof that NFTs are worthless: If you buy the NFT of this album from them, you’ll still not be able to listen to the album.

How incompetent at anything involving the internet do you have to be to open a comment section somewhere and not realize that it’s going to be immediately attacked by 8chaners? Seriously, this would have been malpractice back in 2010.

I think it’s hard to do stories about people with superpowers dealing with the big things that we have going on in the real world. Superman could try to refreeze some of the Arctic. Storm would literally end the droughts in the western US, and the rest of the world. Batman and Iron Man could use their infinite wealth…

No, “working class” is in contrast to “ownership class”, where the bulk of your income comes from labor, be it physical or mental, instead of coming from owning things, like factories or large investments.

Wrong. Criticism can also be urging others to not associate with the person being criticized.

Yes, you might be able to sell your token to an even bigger idiot. That doesn’t mean that buying the token instead of right clicking is a better idea. The person you replied to clearly does understand what NFTs are, and why they’re an idiot idea.

“NFT is basically a cryptographically secure way to claim ownership of a digital asset.”

Well, that, and to sell them to another, bigger fool later on.

It’s a certificate of authenticity that says that the certificate itself is authentic. It says nothing about the underlying picture.

“They told us they wanted a conservative network,” Herring said during the deposition, Reuters reported. “They only had one, which was Fox News, and they had seven others on the other [leftwing] side.”

The anti-vax, anti-masker stuff would survive just fine, as it’s protected by the First Amendment. If you remove Section 230, you’re removing a website’s right to remove those comments if they want. 

Why should a website be forced to host spam?

It’s not that CNN shut down it’s Facebook page, it’s why. No Section 230 means this comment section goes away. It means that, pretty much, every comment section other than those from the big companies that are capable of doing the moderation work to keep them from becoming completely 8chan goes away.

ISPs, sure. You can’t get online without them. But claiming that my site should be required to host any and all neo-Nazi comments that come to it is pretty ludicrous. 

“and that regulation maybe should include blocks against letting literally anyone who logs on from becoming an unlicensed public broadcaster piggybacking off corporate-provided platforms whose sole purpose is to increase engagement by any means necessary to best serve the slate of ads that keeps everyone (except the…

So CNN was found liable for comments users made on their Facebook page. Was Facebook found liable at all? I mean, it is their site. We’re the defaming comments also made on CNN’s own page, assuming it has comments?

“Right to travel" does not mean you're entitled to do so on an airplane.