How fragile do you have to be that pointing out that you contradicted what you said 2 minutes ago is a “personal attack”?

Fuck off. Pointing out that you contradicted yourself is NOT a “breach of etiquette.” Pointing out that you’re a jackass for caring more about your pretend “etiquette” than the facts of the matter is also not a breach of etiquette.

On the advice of the author, I didn’t actually watch any of the segment. But I would have expected the article to have some kind of summary of what went on, not just saying, “Tebow screeched some bullshit about having the highest selling jersey.”

“You do realize it was a joke right?”

“You do realize that the anti semitic video has been removed days after the fact and he had never done any other joke about it since right?”

Literally every industry?

Wrong. That’s like saying the core business of McDonalds is facilitating burger ordering and handling the financial part of the transaction for the fry cook. It’s an absolute asinine argument that no one can buy in good faith.

Well, I guess the ruse worked. For a day, we all thought he wasn’t a complete shit of a person. Back to normal, though.

No. The core business is being a taxi service. The code is there in service of it.

Again, you would be extremely hard pressed to argue that the drivers are not a core part of Uber’s business.

They demand that because of their business. There is nothing in the employee/employer relationship that requires fixed hours.

And people working for Uber are driving people around. And the idea that Uber has only offered code is a flat out lie.

That’s like saying McDonald’s has never made a single person a burger. It’s flat out dishonest.

“The drivers don’t create or manage the code. The drivers don’t own or maintain servers.”

No, there really isn’t, because it’s none of your goddamned business. Weddings are usually planned a year or so in advance. I doubt she was considering coming forward a year ago.

No, he fucking doesn’t. He does nothing but pile on sexual assault survivors by saying he doesn’t like how they did things.

I think you’d have a very difficult time proving that driving passengers around is not a core business of a company who’s purpose is to drive passengers around.

I cannot believe the audacity of their lawyers, claiming that driving is not the core business of Uber.

No, they know they have no chance of winning. If they actually wanted to win, there are easier districts to do it. No, what they want is Conservative Credibility, which comes from losing a district in a heavily Liberal area, so that they can go on Fox News.

Absolutely nothing stops you from doing that yourself.