“But I just don’t understand why you (and by extension, Nintendo) feel the competitive scene needs to cater to your expecations”

“Looks like you can play the “making assumptions about the other person’s argument” game too.”

Didn’t say that. I responded to your bad faith argument about adding something to basketball that wasn’t there before by saying that items were part of the game, and part of how it was developed. Smash also lets you customize your ruleset, so you can play as you wish. It also allows Nintendo to set their tournament up…

There are dozens of other tournaments that play it with items off. Nintendo doesn’t need to add another one.

Last I checked, that’s not actually part of a basketball game. Items are a part of Smash. 

Yeah, but this is why I find competitive Smash boring. The items and stuff are in there for a reason, and I find them to be quite fun. There are an infinite number of other fighting games out there that don’t have these items. 

“which could potentially provide some players with big advantages if they were simply enough to scoop up a powerful item or ultimate attack before their opponent.”

Good for you, no one gives a shit. 

The fact that you are constantly blaming the victim on this just speaks to how terrible of a person you are. The people treating her like shit also CHOSE to treat her like shit; why are they not responsible? Google also CHOSE to ignore that; why is Google not responsible?

“The “accidental” banning of the official twitter for that abortion movie coming out is pretty clear evidence, sure they undid it but they blocked a legitimate twitter for several hours during a critical period in the marketing of the movie. It was probably one rogue actor doing it but it still speaks to a problem.”

“what is going to matter is that you didn’t stop him or speak up”

The article contains direct quotations from one of the targets.

“They[The tech companies] should not be able to discriminate against conservatives.”

If they do end up repealing Section 230 to where the site can be held liable, wouldn’t Gab and Voat be sued out of existence in 5 seconds flat?

Once again proving that Conservatives are not upset that their speech is being “censored”, they’re just upset that their reprehensible ideas aren’t popular. 

No, you’re blaming the victim. There is zero sense whatsoever in saying that someone is to blame when being treated like that. You saying she should have left is you saying that treatment is A-OK. 

Saying “CHOSE” shows that you really don’t know the issue at hand here. Just about every job requires singing those shitty things, or you don’t get hired.

Any settlement that doesn’t result in the firing of those people would be a miscarriage of justice. 

Good thing not a single person is calling for it based on “disagreement”. Unless you’re talking about “disagreeing” with anti-semitism. 

Why? Who gets to choose which employers are entitled to cheap labor?