“Imagine being such a corporate cheerleader that you demonize consumers from organizing and giving feedback.”

No, what’s disrespectful is offering “thoughts and prayers” when you have the ability to actually do something about the problem. 

They’ve won the World Cup, whereas the Men failed to qualify for the last one. Anyone who agrees with any kind of “meritocracy” argument cannot disagree that they deserve the pay more. 

“None of these people who leave get a pass.”

The insight to be gotten is, “They are perfectly ok with the extremism taking over the party so long as they get tax cuts and conservative judges.” And to me, yes, they are exactly the same. I see no difference between one of the right wing extremists, and those that side with them so they can get tax cuts. Because…

Sorry, but they are no longer moderate at that point.

Hasn’t the internet proven, time and time again, that ignoring the trolls doesn’t work? 

I flat out reject your premise that her comments were anything close to racism, or anything close to common GOP statements. 

No, I am not. The House can quite easily, and very much should, rebuke that behavior. 

I thought it was clear that AOC felt that Omar had been “called in”, and had recognized how what she said could be construed as hurtful to some. Omar has since apologized for the remarks, so no further action should be needed. And then AOC addressed the pure inanity of a resolution decrying Omar’s remarks when people…

What if the “resolving the issue” she wants is for them to not use her content?

So many roguelikes could benefit from having an option to turn off perma-death. 

Right, but why add to the outrage? Save your energy for the things that really matter, and quite frankly, Hannity doesn’t matter at this stage. 

This is why conservatives constantly get dismissed around here. They don’t want to discuss things in good faith. 

What danger did this bill have of not passing the House? Even without that amendment, there were still enough votes to pass. And even with the amendment, the Senate was never going to even look at it, let alone take it up for a vote. 

Capitalism encouraged the bosses to be shitty. Capitalism encouraged them to slash wages. Trying to say Capitalism had nothing to do with it is like saying a rainstorm had nothing to do with a flooding river

To be honest, no, they aren’t. The employees all quit, but now have an uncertain employment situation. They may not have had jobs lined up. They may now face uncertainty as to whether they can continue to pay rent. They may now face uncertainty as to where their next meal is coming from.

“No. If I buy shoes, I don’t pay the store for the shoes & the employee for getting them for me.”

Yeah, but it’s the exact same for literally any other tipped worker. 

That’s not going to teach anyone anything. They need to be savagely beaten.