Because then you might actually be able to provide an answer? Seriously, explain what “context” is missing from this story. Explain how that context would change the outcome of the story. 

“Who said I was expecting something to change?”

Playing in an already destroyed stadium would be the most Raiders thing ever.

Good for you. Answer the question: What bearing at all does her behavior have to do with this?

What situation? Again, what exactly would change things? What would be this “other side” you’re looking for? In what universe does anything about her have any bearing on the story? 

I’ve read your comments. You still haven’t answered the question: What is the “other side” that you’re looking for by asking what kind of person she is? How would finding out she’s a shitty person too change things? 

Name the exact law that was broken. Name the exact statute they could have been prosecuted under. 

Nobody is claiming that being transgender lets you be a shitty person. What is being disputed is that there is any justification at all, regardless of how shitty the transgender person may or may not be, for using that kind of shit.

You yourself said that how they were to work with wouldn’t excuse the behavior. So tell me, exactly what would that information do? Suppose they were an asshole. How exactly would that change things? 

You’re not trying to get both sides of anything. The other side of bigotry is not, “Well, sometimes they were a bit grating to work with.”

Again, what she is like to work with, by your own fucking admission, has nothing to do with this. So there is zero reason for you to bring it up, unless you want to blame her for what happened. 

Bull fucking shit. The only reason to bring up what they were like to work with as a person is to try and blame her for what happened. 

Their thinking is probably, “I have no use for tampons, so therefore nobody does. Let’s put something I have use for, which obviously everyone will have use for.”

In what way, shape, or form would that lend any justification for the harassment?

What was the different point of view? That it’s ok to use bigoted slurs, cause they “didn’t really mean it”?

The devil has plenty of advocates.

Hopefully you start the year with all of it?

There is exactly zero justification for not paying out PTO, that the person has earned. None. If you don’t, then you are a shitty company, and you are cowering in a shitty state. 

If he runs as a Democrat, he has to go through the primary process, and drop out after South Carolina. 

The entire reason for your post is “whataboutism”.