Ashley is a great performer, good on her for standing up to Deen and his enablers
Ashley is a great performer, good on her for standing up to Deen and his enablers
Who is forcing you to feel divided over losing elections?
You wanted to professionally execute someone’s job and reputation without a trial or empirical evidence .
Because cops only photograph the scene of the crime afterwards. They actually stop less than 5% of crimes in progress.
Own the results of “progressive” pols and writers pushing, and tolerating anger and violence as explicit political weapons. It’s not OK just because you choose to feel divided, which is in fact a choice.
DiFi’s tactics are opportunistic by definition. IF the claims were so important to her, she’d have raised them on day one of the actual hearings.
I’d put more credibility into worrying about interfering, judgmental hypocrites if the argument was applied to all sides...not just the ones you dislike. Interference with innocent people doesn’t turn OK because you are pursuing some grand goal.
Funny, you never complained about Michelle’s designer outfits.
Because crimes committed by citizens are not preventable by not allowing them here in the first place. The Watts case wasn’t due to govt failure, Ms Tibbets, was. She was killed by someone who shouldn’t have been in the US to begin with.
How is it you ‘know’ what ‘those people’ care about, exactly?
Mexicans are not a race, sorry. Ms Tibbets was not destined to be murdered by someone, if an illegal hadn’t been here to do... so she’d still be alive.
You don’t get to decide who likes what music for what reasons, or who can say what words.
you still pay thousands for braces. the continual implication that services are free is a misnomer at worst and an outright lie at best.
It’s precisely the mandates and interventions choking the US system which result in the outrageous costs, and those costs in and of themselves are proof the culprit is govt, not markets. In real markets, you can’t price out your customers or you go under.
How inclusive.
They should rule on the ideas as they interpret them, not give lousy ideas affirmative action rulings.
Nobody stole anything. There is no requirement to vote at any particular time on a nominee. Further, the D’s used this tactic before, it’s legitimate politics.
It’s not toxic masculinity to expect due process and innocent until proven guilty. It’s called rule of law and the basics of post enlightenment civilization.
Do ‘something’ because the rest of us elected someone you don’t like? What makes you so special ,that your elitism should override the rules?
Yup. The rest of us are the rest of the shitberg, and happy to be.