That would be pretty fun really. Every argument would be exactly the elitist tripe we’re so used to now, and begging for the appropriate responses as such.

Yeah, then they could agree to screw the US over while giggling over the great unwashed they’re saving from themselves, while caring so very, very much.

Yeah, that’s who commits arson and riots across the US.....Trump supporters, not leftists.

Trump is merely making sure we’re not pushed around like we were during O’s term. Actual leadership, in short. I don’t agree much with his style for sure, but the clarity is very refreshing. I don’t *care* what Europe wants other than what they’ll get in a deal which puts the US interests first for the US, and being…

If the elites were more empathetic and actually unselfish, instead of the direct opposites of both to anyone outside their in group, this wouldn’t be an issue. You’ve gotten what you earned with the control freak worldview combined with the snobbery and outright hostility to anyone who isn’t ‘woke’ enough for ya.

Just like any other crime, you choose wether or not to tear apart your own family by deciding to commit the crime or not commit the crime.

Why don’t you believe? Your own justifications for disliking other people’s politics are not necessarily accurate depictions of what they care about. It’s possible to be anti illegal immigration and anti rape all at the same time, because the two are not linked to begin with.

Not long. There’s so much more focus on noise than depth from a lot of contributors, but that’s life in a click bait media environment I suppose.

This would look a lot more consistent if there had been outrage over Facebook letting Obama’s folks use their data. Now it just looks like what is it, partisan sour grapes.

This assumes that the princesses are a random distribution. It could be that the traits and ideals which yield their the moral attributes consistent with classic western civilization’s ideals, indicate against abortion.

During that time guns were far more accessible, you could by them mail order right up until about 1980ish. The idea that increased ‘applications’ means that earlier laws weren’t lax and we haven’t seen a change in public morality is a non starter. The argument is a good one...we ran the general easy access to firearms…

Separation of religion and State, please. No, Yosemite is not sacred.

She didn’t mention that the black 14 times more likely to be shot....is 13x more likely to be shot by another black person than a white one.

Nah, I reject the idea of systemic oppression based on race when you use outcomes, instead of proof of instances of actual systemic racism, as the metric.

I’m glad this was ousted. The methodology behind ‘privilege’theory is suspect at best and very poor in the cases I’ve examined. It seems to have been tailor made to attack whites but not be applied to the zillion other places the same ideas apply. I’ve examined many of the ‘tests’ for it, and they all contain ideas…

It wasn’t that great a film. I enjoyed it, but it wasn’t a 10. Darkest Hour should have gotten best picture.

Pretty much true. They’re not the only ones, but they’re on board. Noticing reality isn’t paranoia.

Thanks for the phone thing, I thought I was the only one hating that. Get your set done and move on, don’t sit there reading your email.

As long as we can agree that leggings ain’t pants, it’s all good.

Has anybody really thought about the implications of worshipping a movie which contains such a tribalist, primitive political system? Fighting rather than voting, *hereditary* implications in leaderships, an exclusionary race related nation which keeps outsiders out for purity? This is like a white nationalists wet…