You know what, regardless of my opinion on the car or the company or whatever, this is an awesome picture! 

This is technically correct, while still missing the point. No one thinks “piece of paper demanding remediation”, people think “big fuck up that can kill you if not addressed”, which is not the case.

Come on, I was expecting a huge issue, cars going away to get fixed in a shop, cats and dogs living together etc. This is just an OTA about fonts - technically a recall, like birds are technically dinos. I love shitting on Elon just as much as the next guy, but using clickbaity hyperbole just makes him stronger.

I consider myself woke, but I know better than to throw “racist” willy nilly at anyone I consider out of touch. 

He could’ve said that his career as a columnist is on the way, which is technically true. But since he is still avoiding the subject, I agree this must’ve hurt more than all the other dumb stuff he did or said. And it was all because he had to give his opinion on the British equivalent the Kardashians... 

I only had to use it occasionally with consulting teams. Why a company would bet on that horse escapes me. 

I think that was a “royal we”, meaning himself, or (more likely) Jalopnik. The quote itself implies that the US is a hard market for those small cars.

Of course, this has all the signs of corruption and power through money, but isn’t risky also there in the US to accuse a business of such things without evidence? Again, fuck VinFast, its asshat owner and the corrupt cops, but maybe cover you ass when making such alegations?

This also means a steady flow of parts for the model. Really, as long as sales cover costs for the model, regulations are met and there are other options for those who prefer new designs, there are no downsides! 

Well, we click and comment, don't we? 

You have more cars than I have clothes, and I’m afraid to count mine and find out this isn’t an exaggeration :-)

Would a white or silver car be less prone to death rays?

Elon Musk x Daily Mail.

Where did I mentioned franchisees or parent corps? My point still stands.  

Unfortunately the answer isn't "Miata" :-/

Missing from the narrative is that business owners would force workers to stay night and weekends, and laws and regulation is the only thing preventing that.

The cat is out of the bag, people realized that some business models are built on exploiting workers, it is as simple as that... 

She just saved the dirt when it was new and easy to trace. You should've done the same! 

You are right, let the servants fight for the scraps, maybe this way they'll be motivated enough to pull themselves up by their bootstraps! 

And your business depend on paying those 27 people below living wage, so you can "motivate the slackers to get better education"?