Thanks for that bit of information.

I know, right? This suggests that the future Queen of England has a Private Secretary, who in turn has an Assistant Private Secretary, who in turn is looking for a Personal Assistant.  This Personal Assistant might not get a lot of facetime.

Speaking of reliability, here’s a nice, short article on W. Edwards Deming.

Spot on.

Thanks for making that effort.

The trivially easy solution? Grab a map of seats, and move into the marginals.

A dented passenger door mares an otherwise low-mileage and clean-appearing truck.

even apartment complexes.

To this I say, men: If you have to go to the Stronger Men’s Conference website to ask whether you are allowed to have friends over at your home to watch it together...

José, I know nothing about motorcycles, but this was quite an enjoyable read.

Not any more! :-)

Opinions tagged as “objectively good” or objectively bad” are objectively bad. /s

I Found the One Industry Not Engulfed by the Millennial Aesthetic

Right.

Good observation. I think the common theme is that Republicans think men wearing dresses are to be mocked. Giuliani and Cawthorn are play-acting for their audience, as though it’s Halloween. If instead they were to argue that it’s no big deal for men to wear dresses, that would be apostasy, and they’d get huge…

I would be happier living in a society where it wasn’t natural to assume that orphaned children would be impoverished.  A robust social safety net in the richest country in the history of the world is too much to ask, I guess.

Me too! I’m looking at “Anthropometric Reference Data for Children and Adults: United States, 2015–2018" from the CDC.

56 minutes and 30 seconds is the sweet spot.

There’s a funny kind of blindness at work here. Building up a reputation for being a nice person, all else being equal, is good for business. What does this guy expect by going in the opposite direction?

Thanks for the deep cut.