B-b-but, he's black! Of course the Jezzies think he's guilty!

But the issue isn't whether it's difficult and whether these prpoblems can be worked out. I'm sure they can. The issue is that: 1) doing all of that is eating up taxpayer dollars; 2) there is an opportunity cost for those tax payer dollars, including funding for other military priorities—like I dunno, care for…

Well, once we get all of the kinks out the Russians and Chinese will steal that technology and then it's off to start the 6th generation fighter boondoggle!

I don't really buy the humanist label argument. Women are not treated equally in pretty much any society, some far worse than others. They have every right, and I'd say the necessarity to elevate and focus on themselves as a gender to be treated equally.

The irony being, asking the government to intervene for such a purpose is inherently...patriarchal.

How is it feminist to say that women shouldn't be treated like everyone else, even in a game?

That's true in principle, but if you're criticizing the level of violence in the game, on what moral principle does someone argue that only one portion of the population should be off limits from said violence?

You don't find it inherently wrong to say that ONLY violence against a certain subset of people (based on gender, race, religion, etc) is immoral, implying that the same acts of violence against everyone else is acceptable?

Is this really a common thing though? I've never had any girlfriends send nude pictures of themselves, nor have I ever asked. We were nude in person together—no reason for pictures. And if I wanted pictures of nudes, well, there's a gazillion all over the internet of women gladly putting it out there.

Well said

Yeah, I think that's it. She somehow thought this was an opportunity to indirectly insult the President and the First Lady by targetting their children for asshole-inspired "advice."

Pffftt!! That would be wrong, you know, treating them the same!

Seriously. Looks like that's what women in my home state of California are looking for too.

Victim blaming is okay, it was just a dude that got stabbed.

So women who are domestic violence victims to multiple partners are also culpable due to their choices?

I'm not sure what a discussion of privilege has to do with teaching our children to act with basic decency.

Then build him up with positive messages so that he knows he is strong enough to think for himself and resist those negative influences. Don't assume that he will just do wrong so you need to teach him, and only him—not his sister—not to do wrong.

Crossing sexual lines, and even more so, something like assault is inexcuseable. As for saying bad things—seems that deepnds on what was said and what the context was. Were they demeaning women in general with the belief that women are lesser beings? That's wrong. Were they venting about women and saying bad things…

How many times have women here said they have to teach their sons, and only their sons, not to do bad things—rape, be sexist, etc? It's a consistent refrain. Instead of building them up to do positive things, it's all about warding them off from doing bad things, as though that would be their nature.

Maybe teaching him to be a decent person all around maybe? And not assuming that because he's a male child he's got some inherent evil in him.