All beautiful, but most look like they could all be taken by the same photographer. Extensive editing and software can create anything. This doesn't feel like real photography.

This will sound like I'm hating which I'm honestly not, but the list seems to be more like a list of 30 good photographers who are much better in photoshop. I'm not against photoshop, I just think at some point a photog is more of a digital visual artist than simply a photog. And yes I understand extensive…

Whilst I agree with many of those, no Tim Wallace and no Dean Smith? Show some love for the guys who don't process so heavily!

Am i the only one who misses photos shot with technical skill and lighting know how? i miss photos taken before everyone photshopped the piss out of their images with impossible lighting and lens flares out the wazoo. I know they're still out there but it seems like all that gets love on car sites is shit…