rookiebatman
Rookiebatman
rookiebatman

I remember reading one time that Hasselhoff was really pissed off that SLJ was cast as Fury in the new movies, because apparently, when The Hoff was making this movie, Avi Arad told him "You'll always be Nick Fury," or something like that, and Hasselhoff took it as a binding verbal contract that he would have first

Maybe that's why I didn't like it. I despise the show...

i want to direct you to the comicsalliance review of it that convinced me it's by far the comic-bookiest of the batman adapations:

Gabriel Macht seems to have been able to shake it off too: he stars in "Suits" now on USA Network...

Somebody else just posted the official press release, which includes the phrase "completely remastered," so make of that what you will.

That is great news.

So why even continue to post at all?

This is almost as bad (or worse) as Paramount's Star Trek DVD price gouging.

That actually is a really good question.

I really tried to resist watching these on grainy Youtube uploads until there was an official release, but I finally broke down a while ago (it was probably after this was first announced, but somehow I completely missed the news until now). Fortunately, I only watched season 1 so far. Unfortunately, now that I've

If I wanted dark, grizzled, serious stuff, I'd read Spawn. When I'm reading comics about a guy with a big red S on his chest, and a guy in a bat costume, I want fun. Feel free to have serious moments and gravitas, but I want fun, first and foremost.

Does anybody know whether the celebrity "window cameos" will be included?

Wow, you've really just stopped trying, haven't you?

Yeah, I did notice the word usage there, but gave you the benefit of the doubt that you wouldn't have been making the point that it's impossible for you to mistreat actors, since that argument is completely ancillary to anything we were talking about. Where on your cutesy pyramid chart does that fall?

Oh, so you're saying that because you make less money than the actors, it's impossible for you to make generalizations about them? Don't know why I didn't figure that out on my own.

Never mind that merely by virtue of our completely opposite positions on the socioeconomic sphere I am incapable of actually discriminating against these people in the first place.

Um, like, all the other groups we were already talking about? I didn't think I would have to clarify that.

The directive goes on to explain that tire manufacturers never intended for their precious rubbery products to be stretched, which would massively compromise their handling characteristics, and how adjusting the camber past the point of practicality makes maneuverability, well, unpractical.

Actually, I don't really think it's a slippery slope, it would be more accurate to say that I think people who would make such blanket statements in these less important cases are more likely to already be racist, sexist, or whatever the word is for people who think that all the people on the other side of the

they created a very detailed map of the 'verse and plans of the Serenity,