The directive goes on to explain that tire manufacturers never intended for their precious rubbery products to be stretched, which would massively compromise their handling characteristics, and how adjusting the camber past the point of practicality makes maneuverability, well, unpractical.

"Dissenting opinions" looks an awful lot like "rape apologism" from where the fuck I'm sitting.

Too bad shooting's already started on Batman v Superman. Clearly, this is the most qualified person to be playing Wonder Woman. No one would ever accuse her of not being strong enough.

The worst part was when the one guy said "Are you not entertained?" Like, how long have you been waiting to use that one, huh?

This is complete bullshit. If he didn't rape someone, he should absolutely defend himself. People are raped and it's horrible, but people are also falsely accused and that's also an injustice. These things come down to pure "he said, she said" and that's what makes them so difficult, but an innocent person shouldn't…

So if you ever find yourself questioning a poor person with a cellphone, or a lady on food stamps still getting her hair done — also a criticism lobbed at Katrina Gilbert, a poor single mother in Chattanooga who did all the right things and still struggled to get by — then consider that perhaps the person with the…

Dude, find something else to feign outrage about.

Perhaps it is possible no one posted that bullshit because I did first?

Go ahead, tell me how I'm wrong.

I think you're just mad he called out the stupid people about to make stupid comments. You read it and thought "Derp, I'm busted already".

Your mileage may vary, of course, but it seemed to me like the second and third were being deliberately snarky (this is the internet, after all), and the first one was making the valid point that the network might possibly have been deliberately contributing to the objectification. I interpret it as adding blame to…

Well, your original post is also imprecise. You suggested that 'rhythm' was making a comment that he was actually lampooning: "So far, it's just you." That's might be why Alex posted about you not understanding sarcasm. Upgrade your reading comprehension.

Fair point. So I don't pay enough attention to usernames. But if we change the single use of the pronoun "you" from my previous post, I'm still going to confidently stand by the rest of it.

Okay, go ahead and educate me, oh wise one. What was he actually doing that I failed to understand (since you've decided you're qualified to speak for him)?

someone doesn't understand sarcasm

TYPICAL LIBERAL MEDIA BEING THE PC POLICE!!!! She should be flattered.

"Alright, let's talk about Beyonce and Jay Z, can we?" Yeah, that'll recover your image as a credible, serious news source.

But it's maintaining group control, which is the end-all-be-all.

That kid'll lay down the smack on both her sisters...

Remember when Mom would turn the car around and drive right the fuck back home because your two sisters wouldn't stop fighting, so none of you got to get ice cream that night, even though you personally had nothing to do with it? Like that.